From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Virtual huge zero page Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 20:36:04 +0300 Message-ID: <20121001173604.GC20915@shutemov.name> References: <1348875441-19561-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20120929134811.GC26989@redhat.com> <5069B804.6040902@linux.intel.com> <20121001163118.GC18051@redhat.com> <5069CCF9.7040309@linux.intel.com> <20121001172624.GD18051@redhat.com> <5069D3D8.9070805@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5069D3D8.9070805@linux.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Ingo Molnar , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:33:12AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Overall, I'm okay with either as long as we don't lock down 2 MB when > there isn't a huge zero page in use. Is shinker-reclaimable huge zero page okay for you? -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from shutemov.name ([176.9.204.213]:59655 "EHLO shutemov.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751232Ab2JARfb (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2012 13:35:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 20:36:04 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Virtual huge zero page Message-ID: <20121001173604.GC20915@shutemov.name> References: <1348875441-19561-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20120929134811.GC26989@redhat.com> <5069B804.6040902@linux.intel.com> <20121001163118.GC18051@redhat.com> <5069CCF9.7040309@linux.intel.com> <20121001172624.GD18051@redhat.com> <5069D3D8.9070805@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5069D3D8.9070805@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Ingo Molnar , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20121001173604.JKT_39G7LZqC1eGuaQyy4WBstJ4Y2aI0n1E5zL1-1Rg@z> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:33:12AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Overall, I'm okay with either as long as we don't lock down 2 MB when > there isn't a huge zero page in use. Is shinker-reclaimable huge zero page okay for you? -- Kirill A. Shutemov