* [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64
@ 2012-10-04 19:46 David Miller
2012-10-05 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2012-10-04 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm; +Cc: sparclinux, linux-kernel, linux-arch, akpm, aarcange, hannes
Changes since V1:
1) Respun against mmotm
2) Bug fix for pgtable allocation, need real locking instead of
just preemption disabling.
Andrew, you can probably take patch #5 in this series and combine
it into:
mm-thp-fix-the-update_mmu_cache-last-argument-passing-in-mm-huge_memoryc.patch
in your batch. And finally add a NOP implementation for S390
and any other huge page supporting architectures.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64
2012-10-04 19:46 [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64 David Miller
@ 2012-10-05 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-05 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-05 21:45 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2012-10-05 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: linux-mm, sparclinux, linux-kernel, linux-arch, aarcange, hannes,
Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:46:24 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> Changes since V1:
>
> 1) Respun against mmotm
>
> 2) Bug fix for pgtable allocation, need real locking instead of
> just preemption disabling.
>
> Andrew, you can probably take patch #5 in this series and combine
> it into:
>
> mm-thp-fix-the-update_mmu_cache-last-argument-passing-in-mm-huge_memoryc.patch
>
> in your batch. And finally add a NOP implementation for S390
> and any other huge page supporting architectures.
>
David, I don't know what to do until there's some clarity on the
numa/sched changes. Andrea has a new autonuma patchset, Peter's code
is in -next and I don't know if it's planned for 3.7 merging. And I
suspect (hope) that it won't be merged if that is indeed planned.
Two days I asked what's going on and didn't get told. I put the entire
MM merge on hold yesterday and went off to do other things. At present
I plan to restage MM against mainline and send it all along to Linus on
Monday. If that happens and if you wish that the sparc changes be
merged for 3.7, I suggest that you rebase and retest on Tuesday and ask
Linus to pull it, with my ack.
Sorry.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64
2012-10-05 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2012-10-05 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-05 21:45 ` David Miller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2012-10-05 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: linux-mm, sparclinux, linux-kernel, linux-arch, aarcange, hannes,
Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:46:24 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> Changes since V1:
>
> 1) Respun against mmotm
>
> 2) Bug fix for pgtable allocation, need real locking instead of
> just preemption disabling.
>
> Andrew, you can probably take patch #5 in this series and combine
> it into:
>
> mm-thp-fix-the-update_mmu_cache-last-argument-passing-in-mm-huge_memoryc.patch
>
> in your batch. And finally add a NOP implementation for S390
> and any other huge page supporting architectures.
>
David, I don't know what to do until there's some clarity on the
numa/sched changes. Andrea has a new autonuma patchset, Peter's code
is in -next and I don't know if it's planned for 3.7 merging. And I
suspect (hope) that it won't be merged if that is indeed planned.
Two days I asked what's going on and didn't get told. I put the entire
MM merge on hold yesterday and went off to do other things. At present
I plan to restage MM against mainline and send it all along to Linus on
Monday. If that happens and if you wish that the sparc changes be
merged for 3.7, I suggest that you rebase and retest on Tuesday and ask
Linus to pull it, with my ack.
Sorry.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64
2012-10-05 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-05 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2012-10-05 21:45 ` David Miller
2012-10-05 21:45 ` David Miller
2012-10-05 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2012-10-05 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm
Cc: linux-mm, sparclinux, linux-kernel, linux-arch, aarcange, hannes,
mingo, a.p.zijlstra, torvalds
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:36:44 -0700
> David, I don't know what to do until there's some clarity on the
> numa/sched changes. Andrea has a new autonuma patchset, Peter's code
> is in -next and I don't know if it's planned for 3.7 merging. And I
> suspect (hope) that it won't be merged if that is indeed planned.
It doesn't matter from a sparc64 perspective.
If you remove the autonuma patch, I'll still compile and work.
I just provide an unused interface.
Please do something instead of stalling these changes further.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64
2012-10-05 21:45 ` David Miller
@ 2012-10-05 21:45 ` David Miller
2012-10-05 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2012-10-05 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm
Cc: linux-mm, sparclinux, linux-kernel, linux-arch, aarcange, hannes,
mingo, a.p.zijlstra, torvalds
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:36:44 -0700
> David, I don't know what to do until there's some clarity on the
> numa/sched changes. Andrea has a new autonuma patchset, Peter's code
> is in -next and I don't know if it's planned for 3.7 merging. And I
> suspect (hope) that it won't be merged if that is indeed planned.
It doesn't matter from a sparc64 perspective.
If you remove the autonuma patch, I'll still compile and work.
I just provide an unused interface.
Please do something instead of stalling these changes further.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64
2012-10-05 21:45 ` David Miller
2012-10-05 21:45 ` David Miller
@ 2012-10-05 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-05 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2012-10-05 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: linux-mm, sparclinux, linux-kernel, linux-arch, aarcange, hannes,
mingo, a.p.zijlstra, torvalds
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:45:08 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:36:44 -0700
>
> > David, I don't know what to do until there's some clarity on the
> > numa/sched changes. Andrea has a new autonuma patchset, Peter's code
> > is in -next and I don't know if it's planned for 3.7 merging. And I
> > suspect (hope) that it won't be merged if that is indeed planned.
>
> It doesn't matter from a sparc64 perspective.
>
> If you remove the autonuma patch, I'll still compile and work.
> I just provide an unused interface.
ah, OK.
> Please do something instead of stalling these changes further.
OK, I'll add it all to the pile and will restage it against mainline on
Monday.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64
2012-10-05 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2012-10-05 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2012-10-05 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: linux-mm, sparclinux, linux-kernel, linux-arch, aarcange, hannes,
mingo, a.p.zijlstra, torvalds
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:45:08 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:36:44 -0700
>
> > David, I don't know what to do until there's some clarity on the
> > numa/sched changes. Andrea has a new autonuma patchset, Peter's code
> > is in -next and I don't know if it's planned for 3.7 merging. And I
> > suspect (hope) that it won't be merged if that is indeed planned.
>
> It doesn't matter from a sparc64 perspective.
>
> If you remove the autonuma patch, I'll still compile and work.
> I just provide an unused interface.
ah, OK.
> Please do something instead of stalling these changes further.
OK, I'll add it all to the pile and will restage it against mainline on
Monday.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-05 22:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-04 19:46 [PATCH v2 0/8] THP support for Sparc64 David Miller
2012-10-05 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-05 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-05 21:45 ` David Miller
2012-10-05 21:45 ` David Miller
2012-10-05 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-05 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).