From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: new execve/kernel_thread design Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:43:37 +0100 Message-ID: <20121017054337.GX2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20121016223508.GR2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Max Filippov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 09:32:34AM +0400, Max Filippov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Al Viro wrote: > > [apologies for enormous Cc; I've talked to some of you in private mail > > and after being politely asked to explain WTF was all that thing for > > and how was it supposed to work, well...] > > [...] > > > Not even a tentative patchset: hexagon, openrisc, tile, xtensa. > > I'm doing xtensa part. Thanks; I hope this variant is going to be less painful than messing with ret_from_kernel_execve()... > BTW, what linus-arch ML might be for? A typo, noticed only when I got a bounce ;-) My apologies... From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:53004 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751974Ab2JQFni (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:43:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:43:37 +0100 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: new execve/kernel_thread design Message-ID: <20121017054337.GX2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20121016223508.GR2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Max Filippov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20121017054337.ahRTPDSiz4t343wwrMCNVSamz3E5bfOz2anP3lt5qWo@z> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 09:32:34AM +0400, Max Filippov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Al Viro wrote: > > [apologies for enormous Cc; I've talked to some of you in private mail > > and after being politely asked to explain WTF was all that thing for > > and how was it supposed to work, well...] > > [...] > > > Not even a tentative patchset: hexagon, openrisc, tile, xtensa. > > I'm doing xtensa part. Thanks; I hope this variant is going to be less painful than messing with ret_from_kernel_execve()... > BTW, what linus-arch ML might be for? A typo, noticed only when I got a bounce ;-) My apologies...