From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic/io.h: remove asm/cacheflush.h include Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:10:23 +0000 Message-ID: <201210251410.23720.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1350984117-17369-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> <1351172416.6232.70.camel@jerome.southpole.se> <5089479F.6070608@imgtec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5089479F.6070608@imgtec.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-bounces@lists.openrisc.net Errors-To: linux-bounces@lists.openrisc.net To: James Hogan Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Guan Xuetao , Mike Frysinger , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , linux@lists.openrisc.net, uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, Chen Liqin , Chris Zankel , Lennox Wu List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Thursday 25 October 2012, James Hogan wrote: > > Who's tree should this go via. I can take it via the openrisc > > tree, but it would be good to get some Ack's that this isn't going > > to break things for the other arch's (in particular score and > > unicore32, since they are untested). > > Yeh I'd like some acks from score and unicore32 if possible, since I > didn't notice I needed the openrisc bit until I tried compiling it. I'm not worried about score, because there have been no updates at all for the entire last year, and I doubt anyone is using that any more. I agree that having an Ack from Guan Xuetao would be good. The patch will also show up in linux-next now, and I can update it if necessary. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:61861 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935102Ab2JYOKg (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:10:36 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic/io.h: remove asm/cacheflush.h include Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:10:23 +0000 References: <1350984117-17369-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> <1351172416.6232.70.camel@jerome.southpole.se> <5089479F.6070608@imgtec.com> In-Reply-To: <5089479F.6070608@imgtec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <201210251410.23720.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: James Hogan Cc: Jonas Bonn , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux@lists.openrisc.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Chris Zankel , Max Filippov , Mike Frysinger , Chen Liqin , Lennox Wu , Guan Xuetao Message-ID: <20121025141023.HQdzJfkLfxC5Fo4bi8tF3T0ZqsFf8cFlTBlsXQJzWxc@z> On Thursday 25 October 2012, James Hogan wrote: > > Who's tree should this go via. I can take it via the openrisc > > tree, but it would be good to get some Ack's that this isn't going > > to break things for the other arch's (in particular score and > > unicore32, since they are untested). > > Yeh I'd like some acks from score and unicore32 if possible, since I > didn't notice I needed the openrisc bit until I tried compiling it. I'm not worried about score, because there have been no updates at all for the entire last year, and I doubt anyone is using that any more. I agree that having an Ack from Guan Xuetao would be good. The patch will also show up in linux-next now, and I can update it if necessary. Arnd