From: Greg KH <gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: kbuild test robot
<fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto
<kuninori.morimoto.gx-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [balbi-usb:xceiv 3/3] drivers/usb/phy/rcar-phy.c:75:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'iowrite32'
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 06:04:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121101130420.GB20982@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121101105034.GE410-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 12:50:34PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 12:33:39PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 06:29:30PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git xceiv
> > > head: 1789e52acc90c87484a109d6349eefe63cabb257
> > > commit: 1789e52acc90c87484a109d6349eefe63cabb257 [3/3] usb: phy: add R-Car USB phy driver
> > > config: make ARCH=cris allyesconfig
> > >
> > > All error/warnings:
> > >
> > > drivers/usb/phy/rcar-phy.c: In function 'rcar_usb_phy_init':
> > > drivers/usb/phy/rcar-phy.c:75:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'iowrite32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > drivers/usb/phy/rcar-phy.c:83:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioread32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > too bad that it compiles fine on x86 and ARM :-(
> >
> > Kuninori, care to send me a fixup patch ? I guess using writel()/readl()
> > should do it ?!?
>
> looks like this isn't enough. We have 6 arches which don't provide
> writel()/readl(), namely blackfin, c6x, openrisc, s390, score, and um.
>
> Should those arches be fixed instead ? Don't we have a single
> memory-mapped access set of APIs which are supposed to be provided by
> all arches ?
>
> Greg, you've been doing this for much more time then I have. Should all
> arches provide writeb/w/l/q and readb/w/l/q ??
I would think so, but I really don't know.
linux-arch people, what do we do about architectures that don't provide
these functions? Just disable building the drivers for them, or do we
fix them somehow?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [balbi-usb:xceiv 3/3] drivers/usb/phy/rcar-phy.c:75:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'iowrite32'
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 06:04:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121101130420.GB20982@kroah.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20121101130420.GnpmDMXuVCCi5MqpDUsQitYITZvkQUT3LpRhGSHbEc4@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121101105034.GE410@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 12:50:34PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 12:33:39PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 06:29:30PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git xceiv
> > > head: 1789e52acc90c87484a109d6349eefe63cabb257
> > > commit: 1789e52acc90c87484a109d6349eefe63cabb257 [3/3] usb: phy: add R-Car USB phy driver
> > > config: make ARCH=cris allyesconfig
> > >
> > > All error/warnings:
> > >
> > > drivers/usb/phy/rcar-phy.c: In function 'rcar_usb_phy_init':
> > > drivers/usb/phy/rcar-phy.c:75:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'iowrite32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > drivers/usb/phy/rcar-phy.c:83:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioread32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > too bad that it compiles fine on x86 and ARM :-(
> >
> > Kuninori, care to send me a fixup patch ? I guess using writel()/readl()
> > should do it ?!?
>
> looks like this isn't enough. We have 6 arches which don't provide
> writel()/readl(), namely blackfin, c6x, openrisc, s390, score, and um.
>
> Should those arches be fixed instead ? Don't we have a single
> memory-mapped access set of APIs which are supposed to be provided by
> all arches ?
>
> Greg, you've been doing this for much more time then I have. Should all
> arches provide writeb/w/l/q and readb/w/l/q ??
I would think so, but I really don't know.
linux-arch people, what do we do about architectures that don't provide
these functions? Just disable building the drivers for them, or do we
fix them somehow?
thanks,
greg k-h
next parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-01 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <50924f0a.QuF7xjrp4IUSKMwd%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
[not found] ` <20121101103339.GD410@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
[not found] ` <20121101105034.GE410@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
[not found] ` <20121101105034.GE410-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-01 13:04 ` Greg KH [this message]
2012-11-01 13:04 ` [balbi-usb:xceiv 3/3] drivers/usb/phy/rcar-phy.c:75:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'iowrite32' Greg KH
2012-11-01 13:23 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20121101132342.GE12489-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-01 13:38 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-11-01 13:38 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-11-01 15:06 ` David Miller
2012-11-02 9:16 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20121102091620.GE17938-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-02 10:05 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-11-02 10:05 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-11-01 13:47 ` Max Filippov
2012-11-01 14:29 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-11-01 15:07 ` David Miller
2012-11-02 9:17 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20121101130420.GB20982-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-01 15:53 ` James Bottomley
2012-11-01 15:53 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121101130420.GB20982@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh-hqyy1w1ycw8ekmwlsbkhg0b+6bgklq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox