linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sigaltstack fun
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:02:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121118210253.GI16916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121118195921.GH16916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 07:59:21PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 02:03:32PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > > I have absolutely no objections. sigaltstack has always been kind of
> > > messy, and made worse by the fact that it gets effectively no testing
> > > (because it's generally not used by normal code and even code that
> > > uses it tends to use it only for very uncommon events). So forcing all
> > > the sigaltstack code into generic code and at least avoiding the
> > > "different architectures can get things subtly - or not so subtly -
> > > wrong in different ways" sounds like a good thing.
> > 
> > FWIW, if folks are looking for testcases there are a small number in
> > glibc, a quick grep shows:
> > 
> > nptl/tst-cancel20.c
> > nptl/tst-cancel21.c
> > nptl/tst-signal6.c
> > debug/tst-longjmp_chk2.c
> > 
> > LTP probably has a bunch too.
> 
> Might be a good idea to start adding tests/* in the kernel tree, perhaps?
> Ones in glibc had been present prior to the LGPLv3 clusterfuck, by the
> look of it...

Incidentally, sparc64 is also broken the same way:
sparc64:~# gcc sigreturn-test.c 
sparc64:~# ./a.out 
entering SIGUSR1 on altstack
entering SIGUSR2 on altstack
SIGUSR2 done
SIGUSR1 done
sparc64:~# gcc -m64 sigreturn-test.c 
sparc64:~# ./a.out 
entering SIGUSR1 on altstack
entering SIGUSR2 on altstack
SIGUSR2 done
Segmentation fault
sparc64:~#

32bit rt_sigreturn (in signal32.c) simply ignores all errors.  One in
signal_64.c fails on *any* error from do_sigaltstack(), with the results
above...

sigreturn-test.c is what I've posted upthread.  I think this one is
-stable fodder.  It's not hard to deal with, fortunately.  Are you
OK with the patch below?  Should be the minimal fix, getting rid of
those segfaults and converting to usual semantics here...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/signal_64.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/signal_64.c
index 867de2f..689e1ba 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/signal_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/signal_64.c
@@ -295,9 +295,7 @@ void do_rt_sigreturn(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		err |= restore_fpu_state(regs, fpu_save);
 
 	err |= __copy_from_user(&set, &sf->mask, sizeof(sigset_t));
-	err |= do_sigaltstack(&sf->stack, NULL, (unsigned long)sf);
-
-	if (err)
+	if (err || do_sigaltstack(&sf->stack, NULL, (unsigned long)sf) == -EFAULT)
 		goto segv;
 
 	err |= __get_user(rwin_save, &sf->rwin_save);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-18 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20121016223508.GR2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-17  5:32 ` new execve/kernel_thread design Max Filippov
2012-10-17  5:43   ` Al Viro
2012-10-17  5:43     ` Al Viro
     [not found] ` <CACM3HyEpypULRWUc5ZnLnZ=uOWf3_j=9PXZiJrT_BXyGcQe9yg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-10-17 14:27   ` Michal Simek
2012-10-17 14:27     ` Michal Simek
2012-10-17 16:07     ` Al Viro
2012-10-17 16:07       ` Al Viro
2012-10-17 16:19       ` Al Viro
2012-10-17 16:19         ` Al Viro
2012-11-15 16:41         ` Michal Simek
2012-11-15 16:41           ` Michal Simek
2012-11-15 21:55           ` Al Viro
2012-11-15 21:55             ` Al Viro
2012-11-16  7:59             ` Michal Simek
2012-11-18  5:45               ` sigaltstack fun (was Re: new execve/kernel_thread design) Al Viro
2012-11-18 18:45                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-18 19:03                   ` sigaltstack fun David Miller
2012-11-18 19:59                     ` Al Viro
2012-11-18 19:59                       ` Al Viro
2012-11-18 20:48                       ` David Miller
2012-11-19  4:55                         ` Greg KH
2012-11-18 21:02                       ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-11-18 21:18                         ` David Miller
2012-11-19  1:10                           ` Al Viro
2012-11-19  1:30                             ` David Miller
2012-11-19  2:35                               ` Al Viro
2012-11-19  2:35                                 ` Al Viro
2012-11-19  3:27                                 ` David Miller
2012-11-26  5:10                                   ` Al Viro
2012-11-26  5:15                                     ` Al Viro
2012-12-04  3:03                                       ` David Miller
2012-12-04  2:58                                     ` David Miller
2012-11-21  1:53                   ` sigaltstack fun (was Re: new execve/kernel_thread design) Al Viro
2012-10-19 20:25 ` [PATCH] tile: support GENERIC_KERNEL_THREAD and GENERIC_KERNEL_EXECVE Chris Metcalf
2012-10-19 20:25   ` Chris Metcalf
2012-10-19 21:35   ` Al Viro
2012-10-20 13:06     ` Chris Metcalf
2012-10-20 15:34       ` Al Viro
2012-10-20 17:16         ` Al Viro
2012-10-23 17:30           ` Chris Metcalf
2012-10-23 18:41             ` Al Viro
2012-10-23 19:22               ` Chris Metcalf
2012-10-23 20:36                 ` Al Viro
2012-10-23 20:36                   ` Al Viro
2012-10-25 13:31                   ` Chris Metcalf
2012-10-25 14:25                     ` Al Viro
2012-10-25 14:25                       ` Al Viro
2012-10-23 20:47               ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-10-23 20:47                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-10-23 20:51                 ` Jeff King
2012-10-23 20:51                   ` Jeff King
2012-10-23 21:09                   ` Catalin Marinas
2012-10-23 21:09                     ` Catalin Marinas
2012-10-23 21:22                     ` Jeff King
2012-10-23 21:22                       ` Jeff King
2012-10-24 11:18                       ` Catalin Marinas
2012-10-24 11:18                         ` Catalin Marinas
2012-10-23 21:25                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-10-23 21:47                     ` Jeff King
2012-10-23 21:47                       ` Jeff King
2012-10-23 22:06                       ` Marc Gauthier
2012-10-23 22:06                         ` Marc Gauthier
2012-10-23 22:23                         ` Jeff King
2012-10-24  6:02                           ` Johannes Sixt
2012-10-24  6:02                             ` Johannes Sixt
2012-10-24  1:02                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-24  1:56                       ` Al Viro
2012-10-24  2:14                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-24  6:02                       ` Ingo Molnar
2012-10-24  6:02                         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-10-23 17:30           ` [PATCH] arch/tile: eliminate pt_regs trampolines for syscalls Chris Metcalf
2012-10-23 17:30             ` Chris Metcalf
2012-10-22 14:23         ` [PATCH] tile: support GENERIC_KERNEL_THREAD and GENERIC_KERNEL_EXECVE Catalin Marinas
2012-10-26 18:31 ` [update] Re: new execve/kernel_thread design Al Viro
2012-10-26 18:31   ` Al Viro
2012-10-27  3:32   ` Al Viro
2012-10-27  3:32     ` Al Viro
2012-10-29  7:53   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-10-29  7:53     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-10-29 13:25     ` Al Viro
2012-10-29 13:25       ` Al Viro
2012-10-29 14:38       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-10-29 14:38         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-10-29 14:57         ` Al Viro
2012-10-29 14:57           ` Al Viro
2012-12-07 22:23   ` Al Viro
2012-12-07 22:23     ` Al Viro
2012-12-08  2:40     ` Chris Metcalf
2012-12-08  2:40       ` Chris Metcalf
2012-12-13  1:54     ` Hirokazu Takata
2012-12-13  1:54       ` Hirokazu Takata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121118210253.GI16916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).