From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se, arnd@arndb.de,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] UAPI: Fix endianness conditionals in linux/raid/md_p.h
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:47:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130306204751.31327.18239.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130306204724.31327.43118.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
In the UAPI header files, __BIG_ENDIAN and __LITTLE_ENDIAN must be compared
against __BYTE_ORDER in preprocessor conditionals where these are exposed to
userspace (that is they're not inside __KERNEL__ conditionals).
However, in the main kernel the norm is to check for "defined(__XXX_ENDIAN)"
rather than comparing against __BYTE_ORDER and this has incorrectly leaked
into the userspace headers.
The definition of struct mdp_superblock_s in linux/raid/md_p.h is wrong in this
way. Note that userspace will likely interpret the ordering of the fields
incorrectly as the big-endian variant on a little-endian machines - depending
on header inclusion order.
[!!!] NOTE [!!!] This patch may adversely change the userspace API. It might
be better to fix the ordering of events_hi, events_lo, cp_events_hi and
cp_events_lo in struct mdp_superblock_s / typedef mdp_super_t.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
---
include/uapi/linux/raid/md_p.h | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/raid/md_p.h b/include/uapi/linux/raid/md_p.h
index ee75353..fe1a540 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/raid/md_p.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/raid/md_p.h
@@ -145,16 +145,18 @@ typedef struct mdp_superblock_s {
__u32 failed_disks; /* 4 Number of failed disks */
__u32 spare_disks; /* 5 Number of spare disks */
__u32 sb_csum; /* 6 checksum of the whole superblock */
-#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
+#if defined(__BYTE_ORDER) ? __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN : defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
__u32 events_hi; /* 7 high-order of superblock update count */
__u32 events_lo; /* 8 low-order of superblock update count */
__u32 cp_events_hi; /* 9 high-order of checkpoint update count */
__u32 cp_events_lo; /* 10 low-order of checkpoint update count */
-#else
+#elif defined(__BYTE_ORDER) ? __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN : defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)
__u32 events_lo; /* 7 low-order of superblock update count */
__u32 events_hi; /* 8 high-order of superblock update count */
__u32 cp_events_lo; /* 9 low-order of checkpoint update count */
__u32 cp_events_hi; /* 10 high-order of checkpoint update count */
+#else
+#error unspecified endianness
#endif
__u32 recovery_cp; /* 11 recovery checkpoint sector count */
/* There are only valid for minor_version > 90 */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-06 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-06 20:47 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] UAPI: Fix up endianness conditionals David Howells
2013-03-06 20:47 ` David Howells
2013-03-06 20:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] UAPI: Fix endianness conditionals in linux/aio_abi.h David Howells
2013-03-06 20:47 ` David Howells
2013-03-12 16:32 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2013-03-12 16:32 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2013-03-12 18:22 ` Jeff Moyer
2013-03-12 18:22 ` Jeff Moyer
2013-03-06 20:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] UAPI: Fix endianness conditionals in linux/acct.h David Howells
2013-03-06 20:47 ` David Howells [this message]
2013-03-12 1:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] UAPI: Fix endianness conditionals in linux/raid/md_p.h NeilBrown
2013-03-06 20:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] UAPI: Fix endianness conditionals in M32R's asm/stat.h David Howells
2013-03-06 20:48 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130306204751.31327.18239.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).