From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized when building with -Os
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:58:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130315175808.GT4977@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7534695.eTHcH0enMV@wuerfel>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:01:35PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc-4.7 and higher add a lot of false positive warnings about
> potential uses of uninitialized warnings, but only when optimizing
> for size (-Os). This is the default when building allyesconfig,
> which turns on CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE.
>
> In order to avoid getting a lot of patches that initialize such
> variables and accidentally hide real errors along the way, let's
> just turn off this warning on the respective gcc versions
> when building with size optimizations. The -Wmaybe-uninitialized
> option was introduced in the same gcc version (4.7) that is now
> causing the false positives, so there is no effect on older compilers.
>
> A side effect is that when building with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE,
> we might now see /fewer/ warnings about possibly uninitialized
> warnings than with -O2, but that is still much better than seeing
> warnings known to be bogus.
What about truely uninitialized uses of variables? Will this hide
their warning too?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-15 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-14 22:01 [PATCH] Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized when building with -Os Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-15 17:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-25 15:44 Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130315175808.GT4977@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).