From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
rth@twiddle.net, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, msalter@redhat.com,
starvik@axis.com, dhowells@redhat.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, takata@linux-m32r.org,
geert@linux-m68k.org, james.hogan@imgtec.com, monstr@monstr.eu,
ralf@linux-mips.org, jonas@southpole.se, rkuo@codeaurora.org,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, liqin.chen@sunplusct.com,
davem@davemloft.net, lethal@linux-sh.org, vgupta@synopsys.com,
chris@zankel.net, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn,
jdike@addtoit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86: don't show trace beyond show_stack(NULL, NULL)
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 18:08:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130408160811.GA20612@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365016497-32033-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> show_stack(current or NULL, NULL) is used to print the backtrace of
> the current task. As trace beyond the function itself isn't of much
> interest to anyone, don't show it by determining sp and bp in
> show_stack()'s frame and passing them to show_stack_log_lvl().
>
> This brings show_stack(NULL, NULL)'s behavior in line with
> dump_stack().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> index c8797d5..dd1a7c3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,19 @@ void show_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
>
> void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
> {
> - show_stack_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, 0, "");
> + unsigned long bp = 0;
> + unsigned long stack;
> +
> + /*
> + * Stack frames below this one aren't interesting. Don't show them
> + * if we're printing for %current.
> + */
> + if (!sp && (!task || task == current)) {
> + sp = &stack;
> + bp = stack_frame(current, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + show_stack_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, bp, "");
Hm, show_regs() has a similar problem AFAICS.
Would be nice to create an __always_inline helper for all this, and to use it for
show_regs() as well.
Then the !bp special case in dump_trace() could be removed, and !bp be made an
invalid variant.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-08 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 19:14 [PATCHSET v2] arch: unify task dump debug info Tejun Heo
2013-04-03 19:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86: don't show trace beyond show_stack(NULL, NULL) Tejun Heo
2013-04-08 16:08 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-04-08 17:57 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-10 10:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-10 18:54 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-10 20:10 ` [PATCH UPDATED 1/7] x86: don't show trace into stacktrace machinery Tejun Heo
2013-04-10 20:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-10 21:09 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-10 21:09 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-10 21:18 ` [PATCH UPDATED v2 " Tejun Heo
2013-04-03 19:14 ` [PATCH 2/7] sparc32: make show_stack() acquire %fp if @_ksp is not specified Tejun Heo
2013-04-03 19:14 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-03 19:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] dump_stack: consolidate dump_stack() implementations and unify their behaviors Tejun Heo
2013-04-03 19:14 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-04 7:13 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2013-04-12 20:39 ` Chris Metcalf
2013-04-12 21:59 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-03 19:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] dmi: morph dmi_dump_ids() into dmi_format_ids() which formats into a buffer Tejun Heo
2013-04-03 19:14 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-03 19:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] dump_stack: implement arch-specific hardware description in task dumps Tejun Heo
2013-04-03 19:14 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-03 19:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] dump_stack: unify debug information printed by show_regs() Tejun Heo
2013-04-03 19:14 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-12 20:37 ` Chris Metcalf
2013-04-03 19:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] arc, print-fatal-signals: reduce duplicated information Tejun Heo
2013-04-03 19:14 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-08 15:31 ` [PATCHSET v2] arch: unify task dump debug info Tejun Heo
2013-04-08 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-11 18:47 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-12 5:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-13 1:14 ` rkuo
2013-04-13 1:14 ` rkuo
2013-04-18 14:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130408160811.GA20612@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=jonas@southpole.se \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rkuo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=starvik@axis.com \
--cc=takata@linux-m32r.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).