From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, "Chandramouleeswaran,
Aswin" <aswin@hp.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@hp.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mutex: Queue mutex spinners with MCS lock to reduce cacheline contention
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:10:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130416091026.GB9569@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366036679-9702-3-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>
* Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com> wrote:
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3021,9 +3021,6 @@ static inline bool owner_running(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
> */
> int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
> {
> - if (!sched_feat(OWNER_SPIN))
> - return 0;
> -
> rcu_read_lock();
> while (owner_running(lock, owner)) {
> if (need_resched())
> @@ -3040,6 +3037,27 @@ int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
> */
> return lock->owner == NULL;
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * Initial check for entering the mutex spinning loop
> + */
> +int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
> +{
> + int retval = 1;
> +
> + if (!sched_feat(OWNER_SPIN))
> + return 0;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + if (lock->owner)
> + retval = lock->owner->on_cpu;
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + /*
> + * if lock->owner is not set, the mutex owner may have just acquired
> + * it and not set the owner yet or the mutex has been released.
> + */
> + return retval;
> +}
The SCHED_FEAT_OWNER_SPIN was really just an early hack we did to make
with/without mutex-spinning testable.
I'd suggest a preparatory patch that gets rid of that flag and moves these two
functions from sched/core.c to mutex.c where they belong.
This will also allow the removal of the mutex prototypes from sched.h.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-16 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-15 14:37 [PATCH 0/3 v2] mutex: Improve mutex performance by doing less atomic-ops & better spinning Waiman Long
2013-04-15 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mutex: Make more scalable by doing less atomic operations Waiman Long
2013-04-15 14:45 ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-15 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mutex: Queue mutex spinners with MCS lock to reduce cacheline contention Waiman Long
2013-04-15 14:37 ` Waiman Long
2013-04-15 16:27 ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-16 4:24 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-04-16 12:05 ` Waiman Long
2013-04-16 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-04-16 14:26 ` Waiman Long
2013-04-17 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-17 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-15 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 optional 3/3] mutex: back out architecture specific check for negative mutex count Waiman Long
2013-04-15 14:37 ` Waiman Long
2013-04-16 10:05 ` Will Deacon
2013-04-16 12:10 ` Waiman Long
2013-04-16 9:12 ` [PATCH 0/3 v2] mutex: Improve mutex performance by doing less atomic-ops & better spinning Ingo Molnar
2013-04-16 9:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-16 11:49 ` Waiman Long
2013-04-16 13:09 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130416091026.GB9569@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).