From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, "Chandramouleeswaran,
Aswin" <aswin@hp.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@hp.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] mutex: Remove new typedefs introduced in patch 2
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:17:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130417071724.GA21051@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366172891-7729-5-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>
* Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com> wrote:
> In response to the review comment from Davidlohr, this patch will
> remove the new typedefs introduced by patch 2. It also removes an
> unnecessary barrier() call.
Please backmerge this fix of patch #2 into patch #2, that reduces the number of
patches by one.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-17 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-17 4:28 [PATCH v3 0/5] mutex: Improve mutex performance by doing less atomic-ops & better spinning Waiman Long
2013-04-17 4:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mutex: Make more scalable by doing less atomic operations Waiman Long
2013-04-17 4:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mutex: Queue mutex spinners with MCS lock to reduce cacheline contention Waiman Long
2013-04-17 4:28 ` Waiman Long
2013-04-17 4:28 ` [PATCH v3 optional 3/5] mutex: back out architecture specific check for negative mutex count Waiman Long
2013-04-17 4:28 ` Waiman Long
2013-04-17 4:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mutex: Remove new typedefs introduced in patch 2 Waiman Long
2013-04-17 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-04-17 4:28 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mutex: Move mutex spinning code from sched/core.c back to mutex.c Waiman Long
2013-04-17 7:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-17 19:28 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130417071724.GA21051@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).