linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, "Chandramouleeswaran,
	Aswin" <aswin@hp.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>,
	"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@hp.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mutex: Queue mutex spinners with MCS lock to reduce cacheline contention
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:50:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130417075055.GC31607@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516D5F97.9050203@hp.com>


* Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com> wrote:

> > I'd suggest a preparatory patch that gets rid of that flag and moves these two
> > functions from sched/core.c to mutex.c where they belong.
> >
> > This will also allow the removal of the mutex prototypes from sched.h.
> 
> Yes, I can certainly prepare a patch to remove SCHED_FEAT_OWNER_SPIN & move 
> those functions back to mutex.c after my patch set goes in. As for the timing, 
> do you want me to do it now or it can wait as I will start my vacation later 
> this week and will be back by the end of the month.

I'd suggest waiting with the latest series until you are back, so that you can 
address regressions, should there be any.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-17  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-15 14:37 [PATCH 0/3 v2] mutex: Improve mutex performance by doing less atomic-ops & better spinning Waiman Long
2013-04-15 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mutex: Make more scalable by doing less atomic operations Waiman Long
2013-04-15 14:45   ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-15 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mutex: Queue mutex spinners with MCS lock to reduce cacheline contention Waiman Long
2013-04-15 14:37   ` Waiman Long
2013-04-15 16:27   ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-16  4:24   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-04-16 12:05     ` Waiman Long
2013-04-16  9:10   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-16 14:26     ` Waiman Long
2013-04-17  7:50       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-04-17  7:50         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-15 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 optional 3/3] mutex: back out architecture specific check for negative mutex count Waiman Long
2013-04-15 14:37   ` Waiman Long
2013-04-16 10:05   ` Will Deacon
2013-04-16 12:10     ` Waiman Long
2013-04-16  9:12 ` [PATCH 0/3 v2] mutex: Improve mutex performance by doing less atomic-ops & better spinning Ingo Molnar
2013-04-16  9:12   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-16 11:49   ` Waiman Long
2013-04-16 13:09     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130417075055.GC31607@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
    --cc=aswin@hp.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).