linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/13] ptrace/x86: dont delay "disable" till second pass in ptrace_write_dr7()
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 17:17:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130513151721.GA6273@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130513151631.GA6215@redhat.com>

ptrace_write_dr7() skips ptrace_modify_breakpoint(disabled => true)
unless second_pass, this buys nothing but complicates the code and
means that we always do the main loop twice even if "disabled" was
never true.

The comment says:

	Don't unregister the breakpoints right-away,
	unless all register_user_hw_breakpoint()
	requests have succeeded.

Firstly, we do not do register_user_hw_breakpoint(), it was removed
by 24f1e32c "hw-breakpoints: Rewrite the hw-breakpoints layer on top
of perf events".

We are going to restore register_user_hw_breakpoint() (see the next
patch) but this doesn't matter, after 44234adc "hw-breakpoints: Modify
breakpoints without unregistering them" perf_event_disable() can not
hurt, hw_breakpoint_del() does not free the slot.

Remove the "second_pass" check from the main loop and simplify the
code. Since we have to check "bp != NULL" anyway, the patch also
removes the same check in ptrace_modify_breakpoint() and moves the
comment into ptrace_write_dr7().

With this patch the second pass is only needed to restore the saved
old_dr7. This should never fail, so the patch adds WARN_ON() to catch
the potential problems as Frederic suggested.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c |   53 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
index 0649f16..98b0a2c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -609,14 +609,6 @@ ptrace_modify_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp, int len, int type,
 	int gen_len, gen_type;
 	struct perf_event_attr attr;
 
-	/*
-	 * We should have at least an inactive breakpoint at this
-	 * slot. It means the user is writing dr7 without having
-	 * written the address register first
-	 */
-	if (!bp)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	err = arch_bp_generic_fields(len, type, &gen_len, &gen_type);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
@@ -634,52 +626,47 @@ ptrace_modify_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp, int len, int type,
  */
 static int ptrace_write_dr7(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long data)
 {
-	struct thread_struct *thread = &(tsk->thread);
+	struct thread_struct *thread = &tsk->thread;
 	unsigned long old_dr7;
-	int i, orig_ret = 0, rc = 0;
-	int second_pass = 0;
+	bool second_pass = false;
+	int i, rc, ret = 0;
 
 	data &= ~DR_CONTROL_RESERVED;
 	old_dr7 = ptrace_get_dr7(thread->ptrace_bps);
+
 restore:
-	/*
-	 * Loop through all the hardware breakpoints, making the
-	 * appropriate changes to each.
-	 */
+	rc = 0;
 	for (i = 0; i < HBP_NUM; i++) {
 		unsigned len, type;
 		bool disabled = !decode_dr7(data, i, &len, &type);
 		struct perf_event *bp = thread->ptrace_bps[i];
 
-		if (disabled) {
+		if (!bp) {
+			if (disabled)
+				continue;
 			/*
-			 * Don't unregister the breakpoints right-away, unless
-			 * all register_user_hw_breakpoint() requests have
-			 * succeeded. This prevents any window of opportunity
-			 * for debug register grabbing by other users.
+			 * We should have at least an inactive breakpoint at
+			 * this slot. It means the user is writing dr7 without
+			 * having written the address register first.
 			 */
-			if (!bp || !second_pass)
-				continue;
+			rc = -EINVAL;
+			break;
 		}
 
 		rc = ptrace_modify_breakpoint(bp, len, type, tsk, disabled);
 		if (rc)
 			break;
 	}
-	/*
-	 * Make a second pass to free the remaining unused breakpoints
-	 * or to restore the original breakpoints if an error occurred.
-	 */
-	if (!second_pass) {
-		second_pass = 1;
-		if (rc < 0) {
-			orig_ret = rc;
-			data = old_dr7;
-		}
+
+	/* Restore if the first pass failed, second_pass shouldn't fail. */
+	if (rc && !WARN_ON(second_pass)) {
+		ret = rc;
+		data = old_dr7;
+		second_pass = true;
 		goto restore;
 	}
 
-	return orig_ret < 0 ? orig_ret : rc;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.5.5.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-13 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-13 15:16 [PATCH 0/13] ptrace/hw_breakpoint cleanups/fixes Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:16 ` [PATCH 01/13] ptrace/x86: Revert "hw_breakpoints: Fix racy access to ptrace breakpoints" Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:16   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17 ` [PATCH 02/13] ptrace/powerpc: " Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17 ` [PATCH 03/13] ptrace/arm: " Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17 ` [PATCH 04/13] ptrace/sh: " Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17 ` [PATCH 05/13] ptrace: Revert "Prepare to fix racy accesses on task breakpoints" Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17 ` [PATCH 06/13] ptrace/x86: simplify the "disable" logic in ptrace_write_dr7() Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-05-13 15:17   ` [PATCH 07/13] ptrace/x86: dont delay "disable" till second pass " Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17 ` [PATCH 08/13] ptrace/x86: introduce ptrace_register_breakpoint() Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17 ` [PATCH 09/13] ptrace/x86: ptrace_write_dr7() should create bp if !disabled Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17 ` [PATCH 10/13] ptrace/x86: cleanup ptrace_set_debugreg() Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17 ` [PATCH 11/13] ptrace: PTRACE_DETACH should do flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(child) Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05  4:16   ` Felipe Contreras
2013-05-13 15:17 ` [PATCH 12/13] ptrace/x86: flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint() shoule clear the virtual debug registers Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86: kill TIF_DEBUG Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 15:17   ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130513151721.GA6273@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).