From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
robclark@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, daniel@ffwll.ch,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 6/7] mutex: add more ww tests to test EDEADLK path handling
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:31:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130620113141.4001.54331.stgit@patser> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130620112811.4001.86934.stgit@patser>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
---
lib/locking-selftest.c | 264 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 261 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/locking-selftest.c b/lib/locking-selftest.c
index 37faefd..d554f3f 100644
--- a/lib/locking-selftest.c
+++ b/lib/locking-selftest.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ __setup("debug_locks_verbose=", setup_debug_locks_verbose);
#define LOCKTYPE_WW 0x10
static struct ww_acquire_ctx t, t2;
-static struct ww_mutex o, o2;
+static struct ww_mutex o, o2, o3;
/*
* Normal standalone locks, for the circular and irq-context
@@ -947,12 +947,12 @@ static void reset_locks(void)
I1(A); I1(B); I1(C); I1(D);
I1(X1); I1(X2); I1(Y1); I1(Y2); I1(Z1); I1(Z2);
- I_WW(t); I_WW(t2); I_WW(o.base); I_WW(o2.base);
+ I_WW(t); I_WW(t2); I_WW(o.base); I_WW(o2.base); I_WW(o3.base);
lockdep_reset();
I2(A); I2(B); I2(C); I2(D);
init_shared_classes();
- ww_mutex_init(&o, &ww_lockdep); ww_mutex_init(&o2, &ww_lockdep);
+ ww_mutex_init(&o, &ww_lockdep); ww_mutex_init(&o2, &ww_lockdep); ww_mutex_init(&o3, &ww_lockdep);
memset(&t, 0, sizeof(t)); memset(&t2, 0, sizeof(t2));
memset(&ww_lockdep.acquire_key, 0, sizeof(ww_lockdep.acquire_key));
memset(&ww_lockdep.mutex_key, 0, sizeof(ww_lockdep.mutex_key));
@@ -1292,6 +1292,251 @@ static void ww_test_object_lock_stale_context(void)
WWL(&o, &t);
}
+static void ww_test_edeadlk_normal(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&o2.base);
+ o2.ctx = &t2;
+ mutex_release(&o2.base.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+
+ WWAI(&t);
+ t2 = t;
+ t2.stamp--;
+
+ ret = WWL(&o, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+
+ ret = WWL(&o2, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret != -EDEADLK);
+
+ o2.ctx = NULL;
+ mutex_acquire(&o2.base.dep_map, 0, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+ mutex_unlock(&o2.base);
+ WWU(&o);
+
+ WWL(&o2, &t);
+}
+
+static void ww_test_edeadlk_normal_slow(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&o2.base);
+ mutex_release(&o2.base.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+ o2.ctx = &t2;
+
+ WWAI(&t);
+ t2 = t;
+ t2.stamp--;
+
+ ret = WWL(&o, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+
+ ret = WWL(&o2, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret != -EDEADLK);
+
+ o2.ctx = NULL;
+ mutex_acquire(&o2.base.dep_map, 0, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+ mutex_unlock(&o2.base);
+ WWU(&o);
+
+ ww_mutex_lock_slow(&o2, &t);
+}
+
+static void ww_test_edeadlk_no_unlock(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&o2.base);
+ o2.ctx = &t2;
+ mutex_release(&o2.base.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+
+ WWAI(&t);
+ t2 = t;
+ t2.stamp--;
+
+ ret = WWL(&o, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+
+ ret = WWL(&o2, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret != -EDEADLK);
+
+ o2.ctx = NULL;
+ mutex_acquire(&o2.base.dep_map, 0, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+ mutex_unlock(&o2.base);
+
+ WWL(&o2, &t);
+}
+
+static void ww_test_edeadlk_no_unlock_slow(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&o2.base);
+ mutex_release(&o2.base.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+ o2.ctx = &t2;
+
+ WWAI(&t);
+ t2 = t;
+ t2.stamp--;
+
+ ret = WWL(&o, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+
+ ret = WWL(&o2, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret != -EDEADLK);
+
+ o2.ctx = NULL;
+ mutex_acquire(&o2.base.dep_map, 0, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+ mutex_unlock(&o2.base);
+
+ ww_mutex_lock_slow(&o2, &t);
+}
+
+static void ww_test_edeadlk_acquire_more(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&o2.base);
+ mutex_release(&o2.base.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+ o2.ctx = &t2;
+
+ WWAI(&t);
+ t2 = t;
+ t2.stamp--;
+
+ ret = WWL(&o, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+
+ ret = WWL(&o2, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret != -EDEADLK);
+
+ ret = WWL(&o3, &t);
+}
+
+static void ww_test_edeadlk_acquire_more_slow(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&o2.base);
+ mutex_release(&o2.base.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+ o2.ctx = &t2;
+
+ WWAI(&t);
+ t2 = t;
+ t2.stamp--;
+
+ ret = WWL(&o, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+
+ ret = WWL(&o2, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret != -EDEADLK);
+
+ ww_mutex_lock_slow(&o3, &t);
+}
+
+static void ww_test_edeadlk_acquire_more_edeadlk(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&o2.base);
+ mutex_release(&o2.base.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+ o2.ctx = &t2;
+
+ mutex_lock(&o3.base);
+ mutex_release(&o3.base.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+ o3.ctx = &t2;
+
+ WWAI(&t);
+ t2 = t;
+ t2.stamp--;
+
+ ret = WWL(&o, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+
+ ret = WWL(&o2, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret != -EDEADLK);
+
+ ret = WWL(&o3, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret != -EDEADLK);
+}
+
+static void ww_test_edeadlk_acquire_more_edeadlk_slow(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&o2.base);
+ mutex_release(&o2.base.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+ o2.ctx = &t2;
+
+ mutex_lock(&o3.base);
+ mutex_release(&o3.base.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+ o3.ctx = &t2;
+
+ WWAI(&t);
+ t2 = t;
+ t2.stamp--;
+
+ ret = WWL(&o, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+
+ ret = WWL(&o2, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret != -EDEADLK);
+
+ ww_mutex_lock_slow(&o3, &t);
+}
+
+static void ww_test_edeadlk_acquire_wrong(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&o2.base);
+ mutex_release(&o2.base.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+ o2.ctx = &t2;
+
+ WWAI(&t);
+ t2 = t;
+ t2.stamp--;
+
+ ret = WWL(&o, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+
+ ret = WWL(&o2, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret != -EDEADLK);
+ if (!ret)
+ WWU(&o2);
+
+ WWU(&o);
+
+ ret = WWL(&o3, &t);
+}
+
+static void ww_test_edeadlk_acquire_wrong_slow(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&o2.base);
+ mutex_release(&o2.base.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+ o2.ctx = &t2;
+
+ WWAI(&t);
+ t2 = t;
+ t2.stamp--;
+
+ ret = WWL(&o, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+
+ ret = WWL(&o2, &t);
+ WARN_ON(ret != -EDEADLK);
+ if (!ret)
+ WWU(&o2);
+
+ WWU(&o);
+
+ ww_mutex_lock_slow(&o3, &t);
+}
+
static void ww_test_spin_nest_unlocked(void)
{
raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(&lock_A, &o.base);
@@ -1498,6 +1743,19 @@ static void ww_tests(void)
dotest(ww_test_object_lock_stale_context, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_WW);
printk("\n");
+ print_testname("EDEADLK handling");
+ dotest(ww_test_edeadlk_normal, SUCCESS, LOCKTYPE_WW);
+ dotest(ww_test_edeadlk_normal_slow, SUCCESS, LOCKTYPE_WW);
+ dotest(ww_test_edeadlk_no_unlock, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_WW);
+ dotest(ww_test_edeadlk_no_unlock_slow, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_WW);
+ dotest(ww_test_edeadlk_acquire_more, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_WW);
+ dotest(ww_test_edeadlk_acquire_more_slow, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_WW);
+ dotest(ww_test_edeadlk_acquire_more_edeadlk, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_WW);
+ dotest(ww_test_edeadlk_acquire_more_edeadlk_slow, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_WW);
+ dotest(ww_test_edeadlk_acquire_wrong, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_WW);
+ dotest(ww_test_edeadlk_acquire_wrong_slow, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_WW);
+ printk("\n");
+
print_testname("spinlock nest unlocked");
dotest(ww_test_spin_nest_unlocked, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_WW);
printk("\n");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-20 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-20 11:30 [PATCH v5 0/7] add mutex wait/wound/style style locks Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:30 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] arch: make __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval return whether fastpath succeeded or not Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] mutex: add support for wound/wait style locks, v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-20 12:16 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 12:16 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 12:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-20 12:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-24 8:30 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] mutex: add support for wound/wait style locks Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:58 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] mutex: add support for wound/wait style locks, v5 Ingo Molnar
2013-06-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] mutex: w/w mutex slowpath debugging Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] mutex: Add ww tests to lib/locking-selftest.c. v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] mutex: add more tests to lib/locking-selftest.c Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2013-06-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] mutex: add more ww tests to test EDEADLK path handling Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] locking-selftests: handle unexpected failures more strictly Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130620113141.4001.54331.stgit@patser \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robclark@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).