From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jstancek@redhat.com,
keescook@chromium.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mgahagan@redhat.com,
agospoda@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] gcov: compile specific gcov implementation based on gcc version
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:29:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201308252029.45375.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130824194413.GB2365@localhost.localdomain>
On Saturday 24 August 2013, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> If I understand it correctly, this would mean that you will be able to use only
> one implementation of gcov format at the time. Meaning you will be able to get
> coverage data for module, but not for kernel if it was compiled with different
> gcc(gcda format). This is probably ok if you work only on your module, but I'm
> not sure this is generally the right approach. In this case I would probably
> rather see some support for more gcov formats at the same time(e.g. set of
> callback operations per gcov version). Again I'm probably missing something, but
> I still cannot see reason why to add such feature. If you want gcov support just
> compile your kernel and modules with the same gcc version(gcda format). But if
> this is really needed maybe it would be better to consider some parallel support
> for more gcov formats based on the gcov_info version.
The kernel is always built with exactly one version, including all the modules.
I don't see any reason whatsoever to support externally built modules with gcov,
in particular when they are not built with the system compiler.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-25 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-23 8:39 [RFC PATCH 0/4] add support for gcov format introduced in gcc 4.7 Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] gcov: move gcov structs definitions to a gcc version specific file Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 8:39 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 15:09 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-23 15:09 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-23 16:50 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 16:50 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-26 12:17 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-23 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] gcov: add support for gcc 4.7 gcov format Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 8:39 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 15:12 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-23 21:00 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-26 12:45 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-27 13:41 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-27 13:41 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] gcov: compile specific gcov implementation based on gcc version Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 8:39 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 15:15 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-23 15:21 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-24 19:44 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-25 18:29 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-08-26 14:14 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-27 13:34 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-28 13:46 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-28 13:54 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-28 13:54 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-24 19:12 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-24 19:12 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-26 12:56 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-26 12:56 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-27 13:23 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-27 13:23 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] kernel: add support for init_array constructors Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 8:39 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 15:13 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-23 16:55 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] add support for gcov format introduced in gcc 4.7 Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-23 16:15 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 16:15 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-26 11:39 ` LF.Tan
2013-08-26 11:39 ` LF.Tan
2013-08-26 14:19 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-27 2:38 ` LF.Tan
2013-08-26 11:57 ` Peter Oberparleiter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201308252029.45375.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=agospoda@redhat.com \
--cc=fhrbata@redhat.com \
--cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgahagan@redhat.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).