linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gang.chen@asianux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] Revert smp: Fix SMP function call empty cpu mask race
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 12:43:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130914044300.GA3438@udknight> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130914044136.GA2944@udknight>

On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:41:36PM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:07:05AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> > 
> > Commit f44310b98ddb7 "smp: Fix SMP function call empty cpu mask race"
> > introduced field call_function_data->cpumask_ipi to resolve a race
> > condition in smp_call_function_many().
> > 
> > Later commit 9a46ad6d6df3 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic
> > similar to smp_call_function_single()" fixed the same issue in another
> > way when optimizing smp_call_function_many(), which then obsoletes
> > changes introduced by commit f44310b98ddb7. So revert it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> > Acked-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/smp.c | 16 ++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> > index fe9f773..a034712 100644
> > --- a/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ enum {
> >  struct call_function_data {
> >  	struct call_single_data	__percpu *csd;
> >  	cpumask_var_t		cpumask;
> > -	cpumask_var_t		cpumask_ipi;
> >  };
> >  
> >  static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct call_function_data, cfd_data);
> > @@ -47,9 +46,6 @@ hotplug_cfd(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> >  		if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&cfd->cpumask, GFP_KERNEL,
> >  				cpu_to_node(cpu)))
> >  			return notifier_from_errno(-ENOMEM);
> > -		if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&cfd->cpumask_ipi, GFP_KERNEL,
> > -				cpu_to_node(cpu)))
> > -			return notifier_from_errno(-ENOMEM);
> >  		cfd->csd = alloc_percpu(struct call_single_data);
> >  		if (!cfd->csd) {
> >  			free_cpumask_var(cfd->cpumask);
> > @@ -64,7 +60,6 @@ hotplug_cfd(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> >  	case CPU_DEAD:
> >  	case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
> >  		free_cpumask_var(cfd->cpumask);
> > -		free_cpumask_var(cfd->cpumask_ipi);
> >  		free_percpu(cfd->csd);
> >  		break;
> >  #endif
> > @@ -255,9 +250,9 @@ int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
> >  				csd = &__get_cpu_var(csd_data);
> >  
> >  			csd_lock(csd);
> > -
> >  			csd->func = func;
> >  			csd->info = info;
> > +
> >  			generic_exec_single(cpu, csd, wait);
> >  		} else {
> >  			err = -ENXIO;	/* CPU not online */
> > @@ -410,13 +405,6 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
> >  	if (unlikely(!cpumask_weight(cfd->cpumask)))
> >  		return;
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * After we put an entry into the list, cfd->cpumask may be cleared
> > -	 * again when another CPU sends another IPI for a SMP function call, so
> > -	 * cfd->cpumask will be zero.
> > -	 */
> > -	cpumask_copy(cfd->cpumask_ipi, cfd->cpumask);
> > -
> >  	for_each_cpu(cpu, cfd->cpumask) {
> >  		struct call_single_data *csd = per_cpu_ptr(cfd->csd, cpu);
> >  		struct call_single_queue *dst =
> > @@ -433,7 +421,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */
> > -	arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi);
> > +	arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask);
> >  
> >  	if (wait) {
> >  		for_each_cpu(cpu, cfd->cpumask) {
> > -- 
> > 1.8.1.2
> Hi Liu and all
> 
> Commit 60c323699bb308404dcb60e8808531e02651578a 
> (kernel/smp.c: free related resources when failure occurs in hotplug_cfd())
> is a fix patch for commit you revert, and it had been merged into mainline.
> 
> So could you ajust your patch to revert it together? I don't think we need
> a separate patch to revert 60c323699bb308404dcb60e8808531e02651578a, because
> your patch haven't be merged.
> 
> Thanks.

Add Cc:gang.chen@asianux.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-14  4:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-11 16:07 [RFC PATCH v2 00/25] simplify generic cross CPU function call implementation Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 01/25] Revert smp: Fix SMP function call empty cpu mask race Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-14  4:41   ` Wang YanQing
2013-09-14  4:41     ` Wang YanQing
2013-09-14  4:43     ` Wang YanQing [this message]
2013-09-16  2:22       ` Chen Gang
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/25] smp, alpha: kill SMP single function call interrupt Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-10-22 10:07   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-10-22 10:18     ` Vineet Gupta
2013-10-22 10:18       ` Vineet Gupta
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/25] smp, ARC: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-25 11:31   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] smp, ARM: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-12  9:14   ` Will Deacon
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/25] smp, ARM64: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-12  9:14   ` Will Deacon
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/25] smp, blackfin: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/25] smp, hexagon: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/25] smp, IA64: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/25] smp, m32r: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/25] smp, metag: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-12 11:14   ` James Hogan
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/25] smp, mips: kill redundant call of generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt() Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/25] smp, mn10300: kill SMP single function call interrupt Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/25] smp, mn10300: enable arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask() Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/25] smp, parisc: kill SMP single function call interrupt Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/25] smp, ppc: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 20:03   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-11 20:03     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-12 14:04     ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/25] smp, s390: prepare for killing generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt() Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/25] smp, sh: kill SMP single function call interrupt Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-12  8:35   ` Paul Mundt
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/25] smp, sparc64: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/25] smp, sparc: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/25] smp, tile: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:51   ` Chris Metcalf
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/25] " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/25] smp, x86: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/25] smp: cleanup unsued generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt() Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/25] smp: rename call_single_queue as call_function_queue Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/25] SMP, trivial: remove unused code from smp_boot.h Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07   ` Jiang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130914044300.GA3438@udknight \
    --to=udknight@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gang.chen@asianux.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=trivial@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).