From: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gang.chen@asianux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] Revert smp: Fix SMP function call empty cpu mask race
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 12:43:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130914044300.GA3438@udknight> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130914044136.GA2944@udknight>
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:41:36PM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:07:05AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> >
> > Commit f44310b98ddb7 "smp: Fix SMP function call empty cpu mask race"
> > introduced field call_function_data->cpumask_ipi to resolve a race
> > condition in smp_call_function_many().
> >
> > Later commit 9a46ad6d6df3 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic
> > similar to smp_call_function_single()" fixed the same issue in another
> > way when optimizing smp_call_function_many(), which then obsoletes
> > changes introduced by commit f44310b98ddb7. So revert it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> > Acked-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/smp.c | 16 ++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> > index fe9f773..a034712 100644
> > --- a/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ enum {
> > struct call_function_data {
> > struct call_single_data __percpu *csd;
> > cpumask_var_t cpumask;
> > - cpumask_var_t cpumask_ipi;
> > };
> >
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct call_function_data, cfd_data);
> > @@ -47,9 +46,6 @@ hotplug_cfd(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> > if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&cfd->cpumask, GFP_KERNEL,
> > cpu_to_node(cpu)))
> > return notifier_from_errno(-ENOMEM);
> > - if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&cfd->cpumask_ipi, GFP_KERNEL,
> > - cpu_to_node(cpu)))
> > - return notifier_from_errno(-ENOMEM);
> > cfd->csd = alloc_percpu(struct call_single_data);
> > if (!cfd->csd) {
> > free_cpumask_var(cfd->cpumask);
> > @@ -64,7 +60,6 @@ hotplug_cfd(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> > case CPU_DEAD:
> > case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
> > free_cpumask_var(cfd->cpumask);
> > - free_cpumask_var(cfd->cpumask_ipi);
> > free_percpu(cfd->csd);
> > break;
> > #endif
> > @@ -255,9 +250,9 @@ int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
> > csd = &__get_cpu_var(csd_data);
> >
> > csd_lock(csd);
> > -
> > csd->func = func;
> > csd->info = info;
> > +
> > generic_exec_single(cpu, csd, wait);
> > } else {
> > err = -ENXIO; /* CPU not online */
> > @@ -410,13 +405,6 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
> > if (unlikely(!cpumask_weight(cfd->cpumask)))
> > return;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * After we put an entry into the list, cfd->cpumask may be cleared
> > - * again when another CPU sends another IPI for a SMP function call, so
> > - * cfd->cpumask will be zero.
> > - */
> > - cpumask_copy(cfd->cpumask_ipi, cfd->cpumask);
> > -
> > for_each_cpu(cpu, cfd->cpumask) {
> > struct call_single_data *csd = per_cpu_ptr(cfd->csd, cpu);
> > struct call_single_queue *dst =
> > @@ -433,7 +421,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
> > }
> >
> > /* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */
> > - arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi);
> > + arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask);
> >
> > if (wait) {
> > for_each_cpu(cpu, cfd->cpumask) {
> > --
> > 1.8.1.2
> Hi Liu and all
>
> Commit 60c323699bb308404dcb60e8808531e02651578a
> (kernel/smp.c: free related resources when failure occurs in hotplug_cfd())
> is a fix patch for commit you revert, and it had been merged into mainline.
>
> So could you ajust your patch to revert it together? I don't think we need
> a separate patch to revert 60c323699bb308404dcb60e8808531e02651578a, because
> your patch haven't be merged.
>
> Thanks.
Add Cc:gang.chen@asianux.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-14 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-11 16:07 [RFC PATCH v2 00/25] simplify generic cross CPU function call implementation Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 01/25] Revert smp: Fix SMP function call empty cpu mask race Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-14 4:41 ` Wang YanQing
2013-09-14 4:41 ` Wang YanQing
2013-09-14 4:43 ` Wang YanQing [this message]
2013-09-16 2:22 ` Chen Gang
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/25] smp, alpha: kill SMP single function call interrupt Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-10-22 10:07 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-10-22 10:18 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-10-22 10:18 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/25] smp, ARC: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-25 11:31 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] smp, ARM: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-12 9:14 ` Will Deacon
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/25] smp, ARM64: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-12 9:14 ` Will Deacon
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/25] smp, blackfin: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/25] smp, hexagon: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/25] smp, IA64: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/25] smp, m32r: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/25] smp, metag: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-12 11:14 ` James Hogan
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/25] smp, mips: kill redundant call of generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt() Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/25] smp, mn10300: kill SMP single function call interrupt Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/25] smp, mn10300: enable arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask() Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/25] smp, parisc: kill SMP single function call interrupt Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/25] smp, ppc: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 20:03 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-11 20:03 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-12 14:04 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/25] smp, s390: prepare for killing generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt() Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/25] smp, sh: kill SMP single function call interrupt Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-12 8:35 ` Paul Mundt
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/25] smp, sparc64: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/25] smp, sparc: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/25] smp, tile: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:51 ` Chris Metcalf
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/25] " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/25] smp, x86: " Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/25] smp: cleanup unsued generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt() Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/25] smp: rename call_single_queue as call_function_queue Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/25] SMP, trivial: remove unused code from smp_boot.h Jiang Liu
2013-09-11 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130914044300.GA3438@udknight \
--to=udknight@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).