From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Domenico Andreoli Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] ARM: u300: use the common machine reset handling Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:19:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20131031151950.GA16491@glitch> References: <20131031062708.520968323@linux.com> <20131031063000.361406973@linux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-ea0-f171.google.com ([209.85.215.171]:55292 "EHLO mail-ea0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755180Ab3JaPT7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:19:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Linus Walleij Cc: Domenico Andreoli , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 07:40:25AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Domenico Andreoli > wrote: > > > From: Domenico Andreoli > > > > Proof of concept: u300 as provider of reset hooks. > > Do you have a u300 to test this on or are you just guessing? I don't have any u300, I picked it randomly. It's just to show some usage and possibly discuss it. There are quite a lot of these hooks all around. > Anyway, concept looks correct, so Acked-by given that the > overall idea is accepted. uhm.. don't see any general acceptance right now. maybe later.. thanks, Domenico