From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] ia64: Use preempt_schedule_irq Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:36:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20131127133655.GA24253@gmail.com> References: <20130917182350.449685712@linutronix.de> <20130917183628.857145384@linutronix.de> <20131121130605.GE10022@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20131126185847.GE789@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51]:48908 "EHLO mail-bk0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750907Ab3K0Ng7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2013 08:36:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131126185847.GE789@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Tony Luck , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Ingo Molnar , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Peter Anvin , Mike Galbraith , Arjan van de Ven , Frederic Weisbecker , Fenghua Yu * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:37:59AM -0800, Tony Luck wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Tony Luck wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > >> On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > >>> Anyway, I don't object to the patch per se, but it might bloat a few > > >>> !ia64 kernels for having to carry the extra text. > > > > > > I tried it out ... if does fix both build & boot for ia64 with > > > PREMPT=n and PREMPT=y > > > > > > Tested-by: Tony Luck > > > > So - are we going with this patch? Or still thinking of something better? > > I queued it; let me prod Ingo (again) into actually merging it. I merged it from you today, will try to get it to Linus later today (hopefully). Thanks, Ingo