From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
"Aswin Chandramouleeswaran\"" <aswin@hp.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/5] qrwlock: Use smp_store_release() in write_unlock()
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 19:39:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140120033947.GA668@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389761047-47566-5-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:44:06PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> This patch modifies the queue_write_unlock() function to use the new
> smp_store_release() function (currently in tip). It also removes the
> temporary implementation of smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release()
> function in qrwlock.c.
>
> This patch will use atomic subtraction instead if the writer field is
> not atomic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h | 10 ++++++----
> kernel/locking/qrwlock.c | 34 ----------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> index 5abb6ca..68f488b 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> @@ -181,11 +181,13 @@ static inline void queue_read_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock)
> static inline void queue_write_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock)
> {
> /*
> - * Make sure that none of the critical section will be leaked out.
> + * If the writer field is atomic, it can be cleared directly.
> + * Otherwise, an atomic subtraction will be used to clear it.
> */
> - smp_mb__before_clear_bit();
> - ACCESS_ONCE(lock->cnts.writer) = 0;
> - smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
> + if (__native_word(lock->cnts.writer))
> + smp_store_release(&lock->cnts.writer, 0);
> + else
> + atomic_sub(_QW_LOCKED, &lock->cnts.rwa);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
> index 053be4d..2727188 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
> @@ -47,40 +47,6 @@
> # define arch_mutex_cpu_relax() cpu_relax()
> #endif
>
> -#ifndef smp_load_acquire
> -# ifdef CONFIG_X86
> -# define smp_load_acquire(p) \
> - ({ \
> - typeof(*p) ___p1 = ACCESS_ONCE(*p); \
> - barrier(); \
> - ___p1; \
> - })
> -# else
> -# define smp_load_acquire(p) \
> - ({ \
> - typeof(*p) ___p1 = ACCESS_ONCE(*p); \
> - smp_mb(); \
> - ___p1; \
> - })
> -# endif
> -#endif
> -
> -#ifndef smp_store_release
> -# ifdef CONFIG_X86
> -# define smp_store_release(p, v) \
> - do { \
> - barrier(); \
> - ACCESS_ONCE(*p) = v; \
> - } while (0)
> -# else
> -# define smp_store_release(p, v) \
> - do { \
> - smp_mb(); \
> - ACCESS_ONCE(*p) = v; \
> - } while (0)
> -# endif
> -#endif
> -
> /*
> * If an xadd (exchange-add) macro isn't available, simulate one with
> * the atomic_add_return() function.
> --
> 1.7.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-20 3:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-15 4:44 [PATCH v9 0/5] qrwlock: Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation Waiman Long
2014-01-15 4:44 ` [PATCH v9 1/5] qrwlock: A " Waiman Long
2014-01-20 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-20 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 15:58 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-15 4:44 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] qrwlock x86: Enable x86 to use queue read/write lock Waiman Long
2014-01-15 4:44 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-20 16:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-20 16:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-20 16:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-21 16:00 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-15 4:44 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] qrwlock, x86 - Treat all data type not bigger than long as atomic in x86 Waiman Long
2014-01-15 4:44 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-20 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-20 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 15:36 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-21 15:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 16:09 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-22 0:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-22 4:42 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-22 4:42 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-22 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-22 12:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-22 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-22 13:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-27 17:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 4:44 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] qrwlock: Use smp_store_release() in write_unlock() Waiman Long
2014-01-15 4:44 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-20 3:39 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-01-20 15:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-20 15:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 15:45 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-21 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-15 4:44 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] qrwlock: Use the mcs_spinlock helper functions for MCS queuing Waiman Long
2014-01-15 4:44 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140120033947.GA668@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).