From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, walken@google.com,
andi@firstfloor.org, riel@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, oleg@redhat.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] qspinlock: Optimize the pending case
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:42:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140310155543.644544511@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20140310154236.038181843@infradead.org
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-qspinlock-pending-test_and_set_bit.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2958 bytes --]
Replace the initial set-pending cmpxchg() loop with an unconditional
test-and-set bit (x86: bts) instruction.
It looses the direct trylock state transition; however since that should
be very unlikely (we've just done a trylock) that shouldn't be a
problem.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h | 2 +
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
--- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ typedef struct qspinlock {
#define _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS (32 - _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET)
#define _Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK (((1U << _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS) - 1) << _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET)
+#define _Q_TAIL_MASK (_Q_TAIL_IDX_MASK | _Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK)
+
#define _Q_LOCKED_VAL (1U << _Q_LOCKED_OFFSET)
#define _Q_PENDING_VAL (1U << _Q_PENDING_OFFSET)
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -83,6 +83,37 @@ static inline struct mcs_spinlock *decod
return per_cpu_ptr(&mcs_nodes[idx], cpu);
}
+/*
+ * 0,0,1 -> 0,1,* ; pending
+ *
+ * Ignore the locked bit; if we set pending and locked happens to be clear
+ * we'll fall through on the subsequent wait.
+ */
+static int __always_inline
+try_set_pending(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
+{
+ if (val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK)
+ return 0; /* fail; queue */
+
+ /*
+ * If we find the pending bit was already set; fail and queue.
+ */
+ if (atomic_test_and_set_bit(_Q_PENDING_OFFSET, &lock->val))
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * If we raced and someone concurrently set the tail; no problem. He
+ * need not have observed our pending bit and can have claimed the
+ * lock.
+ *
+ * The next node in line however will wait for the pending to go away
+ * again though, so in effect we've just flipped order between two
+ * contenders which already had undetermined order as per the race.
+ */
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
#define _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK (_Q_LOCKED_MASK | _Q_PENDING_MASK)
/**
@@ -115,34 +146,10 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp
BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_NR_CPUS >= (1U << _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS));
/*
- * trylock || pending
- *
- * 0,0,0 -> 0,0,1 ; trylock
* 0,0,1 -> 0,1,1 ; pending
*/
- for (;;) {
- /*
- * If we observe any contention; queue.
- */
- if (val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK)
- goto queue;
-
- new = _Q_LOCKED_VAL;
- if (val == new)
- new |= _Q_PENDING_VAL;
-
- old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, val, new);
- if (old == val)
- break;
-
- val = old;
- }
-
- /*
- * we won the trylock
- */
- if (new == _Q_LOCKED_VAL)
- return;
+ if (!try_set_pending(lock, val))
+ goto queue;
/*
* we're pending, wait for the owner to go away.
@@ -186,6 +193,7 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp
* 0,0,0 -> 0,0,1 ; trylock
* p,y,x -> n,y,x ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
*/
+ val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
for (;;) {
new = _Q_LOCKED_VAL;
if (val)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-10 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-10 15:42 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking: qspinlock Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-10 15:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-10 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-13 13:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-10 15:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] qspinlock, x86: Enable x86 to use queue spinlock Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-10 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-10 15:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] qspinlock: Add pending bit Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-10 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-10 15:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] x86: Add atomic_test_and_set_bit() Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-10 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-03-10 15:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] qspinlock: Optimize the pending case Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-10 15:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] qspinlock: Optimize xchg_tail Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-10 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-10 15:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-10 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-11 10:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking: qspinlock Ingo Molnar
2014-03-11 11:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-11 11:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-03-12 3:17 ` Waiman Long
2014-03-12 6:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-12 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-12 19:00 ` Waiman Long
2014-03-12 2:31 ` Dave Chinner
2014-03-12 3:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-03-12 4:26 ` Dave Chinner
2014-03-12 10:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-03-12 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-12 16:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-12 16:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-03-12 16:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-03-12 16:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-12 16:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-12 6:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-12 23:48 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140310155543.644544511@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).