From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] timers updates for 3.15 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:36:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20140314083652.GA22913@gmail.com> References: <1394642174-14315-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20140313110510.GA10424@gmail.com> <20140313153301.GA25296@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f43.google.com ([74.125.83.43]:53057 "EHLO mail-ee0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755477AbaCNIg4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 04:36:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140313153301.GA25296@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Archs , Marcelo Tosatti , Peter Zijlstra , Rik van Riel , Huiqingding * Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > So I propose you something even more simple. The choice of > tip:timers/core as a base was actually just about topic. But there > is no dependency on it. (And actually sched/core would have been a > better choice for a base if any). > > So in order to fix the conflict and minimize the dependencies, I > just rebased the patches on top of tip:core/locking only. No merge > on top of that. It seems to work pretty well. > > The pullable result is in sched/cputime on my tree. Let me know if > that's ok for you. Yeah, that sounds excellent. Thomas, you might want to keep this in a sparate branch from timers/core though. We still have timers/nohz for example. Thanks, Ingo