From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: allow generic unaligned access if the arch supports it
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:36:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140331183618.GY7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9RATUkhya0zytS8FbSM8=49xwNg0m24Xp1LtCWoarDRQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 08:22:43PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 31 March 2014 19:24, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > It actually affects arch/arm as well which selects
> > HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS for v6/v7 and uses the generic
> > unaligned.h
> >
>
> Oops, my bad. I did a quick 'find -name unaligned.h' but misread 'arc'
> for 'arm'.
>
> @Russell: ARM is a user of asm-generic/unaligned.h, and I proposed a
> patch to asm-generic that switches to unaligned accesses if
> HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS is set by the arch. This should affect
> a fair amount of code living under net/ and drivers/ that don't test
> for the Kconfig symbol but expect get_unaligned_xx/put_unaligned_xx to
> turn into something suitable depending on the arch. Any objections?
I'm not sure what you're talking about here, or what change you're
proposing. Without any kind of frame of reference, I can't comment.
Sorry.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-31 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-27 17:46 [PATCH] asm-generic: allow generic unaligned access if the arch supports it Ard Biesheuvel
2014-03-28 18:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-03-28 18:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-03-31 9:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-31 10:07 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-03-31 17:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-31 18:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-03-31 18:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-03-31 18:51 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-04-08 9:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-08 6:48 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140331183618.GY7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox