From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 15:00:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20140404130012.GE10526@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1396445259-27670-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> <1396445259-27670-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1396445259-27670-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Waiman Long Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel , Raghavendra K T , Gleb Natapov , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Aswin Chandramouleeswaran , Scott J Norton , x86@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar , Chegu Vinod , David Vrabel , "H. Peter Anvin" , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E. McKenney" , Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week trying to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series creating the equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@infradead.org You keep on ignoring that; I'll keep on ignoring your patches. I might at some point rewrite some of your pv stuff on top to get this moving again, but I'm not really motivated to work with you atm. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:53751 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752388AbaDDNAh (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:00:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 15:00:12 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation Message-ID: <20140404130012.GE10526@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1396445259-27670-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> <1396445259-27670-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1396445259-27670-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Waiman Long Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "Paul E. McKenney" , Rik van Riel , Linus Torvalds , Raghavendra K T , David Vrabel , Oleg Nesterov , Gleb Natapov , Aswin Chandramouleeswaran , Scott J Norton , Chegu Vinod Message-ID: <20140404130012.XLZ1L3Gt6zdZpWHB1iY-aN9VSs3N1KP2DjUa8cPP1oc@z> So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week trying to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series creating the equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@infradead.org You keep on ignoring that; I'll keep on ignoring your patches. I might at some point rewrite some of your pv stuff on top to get this moving again, but I'm not really motivated to work with you atm.