From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/18] x86: io: implement dummy relaxed accessor macros for writes Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 18:21:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20140523162115.GJ30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1400777250-17335-17-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> <537E30AF.4070501@zytor.com> <20140523144604.GF21319@arm.com> <537F60E0.1060307@zytor.com> <20140523145758.GG21319@arm.com> <537F6728.3090600@zytor.com> <20140523153409.GI21319@arm.com> <537F6C85.107@zytor.com> <20140523155626.GI30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <537F736F.4070002@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4zpRouf6TsWqWFjU" Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:36377 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752373AbaEWQVa (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2014 12:21:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <537F736F.4070002@zytor.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Will Deacon , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "monstr@monstr.eu" , "dhowells@redhat.com" , "broonie@linaro.org" , "benh@kernel.crashing.org" , "paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , davem@davemloft.net --4zpRouf6TsWqWFjU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:12:31AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > So the one issue I had with that, is that if one tries to send an > > email to all arch maintainers + linux-arch + linux-kernel, the > > header gets too big and vger chokes and davem slaps you. > >=20 > > So while its possibly desirable to do big unions with 0/xx and the > > like, its practically infeasible. > >=20 >=20 > ... or at least requires the use of a particular advanced technology > called Bcc:. Not that I like Bcc:s, mind you, but it is probably > better in this case. That's actually a good idea, I'll use Bcc next time. > I have no idea how smart vger is, but it would be interesting if it > could ignore addresses from the MAINTAINERS list... I suppose we should ask davem, although if such a particular loop hole were known it might get abused and we'd all end up with more email :/ --4zpRouf6TsWqWFjU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTf3V7AAoJEHZH4aRLwOS6OSsP/09cbytBwxUUP3FTGWtxDoE2 J+cYI9RJR3w/H0eESPMEw2gmNiFA6YV4xCzioz7uv7B0RipeTRyhxfGM9dsT0nIr MKYY3QpMc7u8LJcmcQCZ2Fx37LiEu5XWV/p446lRxihgMAVWYYiP8KzzF0wrNpvr 2gMvtdLfXLSkhIJN99CzOaNCwkWaHmfG+gqTg++p2owcU/9ax5hQwrdyvJpLKkVN sBeYqbxeNn7XOB08yZ61EUmpJlWAdVBBlq4GugQZto6MhyvMyNQkuWwCzegwxKAM 9IiznNoa3jWDbonBOyeNtq1fG6O56bZm9MblBvvmPk0BAA8CVl2dglpR2gt81cnQ RtE1i+EmeOQv89uZ/JxKcBGmVxmpT+TlevoSiJtuexr99uVELlLTtP5rOHUCY+FT RgGkdcJSWl+eoL0NDV8RtxdQxjCxsyo4AbvNHl9gfV/0bOsusUDaGKNstJyF86/j mTWbctcm8KIOTySGaiL2JkoPu7dCnsmE5npJzTrLZmo1gzOKoane1/BQYvc3Sr4d cr25D0Af2syYwNOGZNBzJbaZcNDDBe1SUQOu4pBPoapFvbV74xPUKF+F1O8LhGQf 6X+Tu767OoSA+fpRqfRy1fuvtjNt0aqtwMYkuuSGgjjcWPdKGGvTDDae415vqig3 QmkwIYEPKVbdiHs/kQak =OBIj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4zpRouf6TsWqWFjU--