Re: [PATCH RFC 00/10] tools: Revamp the unaligned endian access functions

[Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>]

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 04:13:04PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> After a recent problem in the x86 tree, which seems to be the heaviest
> but not the only user of these functions, I went through and did a
> patchset to revamp the *user space* unaligned/endian accessor
> functions.  As much as I think it is downright pathetic that this
> functionality still isn't part of the C standard, that is life and we
> have to deal with it.  Furthermore, although glibc has a pretty nice
> set of functions for byte swapping in <endian.h>, taken from FreeBSD I
> believe, some older systems don't support them.
> 
> This variant tries to fill in all the holes.  It assumes that
> <endian.h> define the functions as macros if they exist, as I don't
> know any other way of probing for them without reaching for autoconf,
> but that should be valid enough of an assumption in this case.
> 
> The hope is that this should give reasonable, if not optimal, code
> generation on most processors, and give a hook where arch maintainers
> can add their own changes if needed.

This looks like a very complex solution to a simple problem.
We want a shared implementation of the *user space*
unaligned/endian accessor functions.
But do we really want *fast* versions for our use?

This is not a new libc that should generate optimal code,
but only something were we want to provide e working
implmentation for use in our user-space tools.

A much simpler approach without any fallback to arch specific
version etc. is everything we need.

	Sam