From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [RFA][PATCH 23/27] metag: ftrace: Remove check of obsolete variable function_trace_stop Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:22:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20140702102211.7a8956a2@gandalf.local.home> References: <20140626165221.736847419@goodmis.org> <20140626165853.049120840@goodmis.org> <20140626133848.0567e365@gandalf.local.home> <53B40A4F.7060102@imgtec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53B40A4F.7060102@imgtec.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: James Hogan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 14:34:07 +0100 James Hogan wrote: > This patch is pretty much the inverse of the original patch that added > it, so looks good to me (and it didn't seem to break anything). > > So, for both this patch and the "ftrace: Remove check for > HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACE_MCOUNT_TEST" one: > > Acked-by: James Hogan Thanks! -- Steve From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.228]:30826 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752264AbaGBOWN (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:22:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:22:11 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [RFA][PATCH 23/27] metag: ftrace: Remove check of obsolete variable function_trace_stop Message-ID: <20140702102211.7a8956a2@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <53B40A4F.7060102@imgtec.com> References: <20140626165221.736847419@goodmis.org> <20140626165853.049120840@goodmis.org> <20140626133848.0567e365@gandalf.local.home> <53B40A4F.7060102@imgtec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: James Hogan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20140702142211.ST3PoyZr9fEbcl_SANlFpaibQ-nDPap29z5Nu0GOdJ8@z> On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 14:34:07 +0100 James Hogan wrote: > This patch is pretty much the inverse of the original patch that added > it, so looks good to me (and it didn't seem to break anything). > > So, for both this patch and the "ftrace: Remove check for > HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACE_MCOUNT_TEST" one: > > Acked-by: James Hogan Thanks! -- Steve