From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-mips-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org,
linux-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>,
x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
Sebastian Ott
<sebott-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
xen-devel-GuqFBffKawtpuQazS67q72D2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
arnab.basu-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf-kv+TWInifGbQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Xinwei Hu <huxinwei-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Ralf Baechle <ralf-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org>,
iom
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/22] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq()
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:33:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140925143346.GF20089@laptop.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411614872-4009-5-git-send-email-wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:14AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Commit 0e4ccb150 added two __weak arch functions arch_msix_mask_irq()
> and arch_msi_mask_irq() to fix a bug found when running xen in x86.
> Introduced these two funcntions make MSI code complex. And mask/unmask
"These two functions made the MSI code more complex."
> is the irq actions related to interrupt controller, should not use
> weak arch functions to override mask/unmask interfaces. This patch
I am bit baffled of what you are saying.
> reverted commit 0e4ccb150 and export struct irq_chip msi_chip, modify
> msi_chip->irq_mask/irq_unmask() in xen init functions to fix this
> bug for simplicity. Also this is preparation for using struct
> msi_chip instead of weak arch MSI functions in all platforms.
> Keep default_msi_mask_irq() and default_msix_mask_irq() in
> linux/msi.h to make s390 MSI code compile happy, they wiil be removed
s/wiil/will.
> in the later patch.
>
> Tested-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
I don't even remember testing it - I guess I did the earlier version.
So a couple of questions since I've totally forgotten about this:
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index 50f67a3..5f8f3af 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ u32 msi_mask(unsigned x)
> * reliably as devices without an INTx disable bit will then generate a
> * level IRQ which will never be cleared.
> */
> -u32 default_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> +u32 __msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> {
> u32 mask_bits = desc->masked;
>
> @@ -176,14 +176,9 @@ u32 default_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> return mask_bits;
> }
>
> -__weak u32 arch_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> -{
> - return default_msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, flag);
> -}
> -
> static void msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> {
> - desc->masked = arch_msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, flag);
> + desc->masked = __msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, flag);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -193,7 +188,7 @@ static void msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> * file. This saves a few milliseconds when initialising devices with lots
> * of MSI-X interrupts.
> */
> -u32 default_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> +u32 __msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> {
> u32 mask_bits = desc->masked;
> unsigned offset = desc->msi_attrib.entry_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE +
> @@ -206,14 +201,9 @@ u32 default_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> return mask_bits;
> }
>
> -__weak u32 arch_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> -{
> - return default_msix_mask_irq(desc, flag);
> -}
> -
> static void msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> {
> - desc->masked = arch_msix_mask_irq(desc, flag);
> + desc->masked = __msix_mask_irq(desc, flag);
> }
>
> static void msi_set_mask_bit(struct irq_data *data, u32 flag)
> @@ -852,7 +842,7 @@ void pci_msi_shutdown(struct pci_dev *dev)
> /* Return the device with MSI unmasked as initial states */
> mask = msi_mask(desc->msi_attrib.multi_cap);
> /* Keep cached state to be restored */
> - arch_msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, ~mask);
> + __msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, ~mask);
If I am reading this right, it will call the old 'default_msi_mask_irq'
which is exactly what we don't want to do under Xen. We want to call
the NOP code.
>
> /* Restore dev->irq to its default pin-assertion irq */
> dev->irq = desc->msi_attrib.default_irq;
> @@ -950,7 +940,7 @@ void pci_msix_shutdown(struct pci_dev *dev)
> /* Return the device with MSI-X masked as initial states */
> list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
> /* Keep cached states to be restored */
> - arch_msix_mask_irq(entry, 1);
> + __msix_mask_irq(entry, 1);
Ditto here.
Looking more at this code I have to retract my Reviewed-by and Tested-by
on the whole series.
Is it possible to get a git tree for this please?
> }
>
> msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE, 0);
> diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
> index 45ef8cb..cc46a62 100644
> --- a/include/linux/msi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/msi.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ void read_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg);
> void get_cached_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg);
> void __write_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg);
> void write_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg);
> +u32 __msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag);
> +u32 __msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag);
>
> struct msi_desc {
> struct {
> @@ -59,8 +61,8 @@ void arch_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
>
> void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
> void default_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
> -u32 default_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag);
> -u32 default_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag);
> +#define default_msi_mask_irq __msi_mask_irq
> +#define default_msix_mask_irq __msix_mask_irq
>
> struct msi_chip {
> struct module *owner;
> --
> 1.7.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>, Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com,
Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com, x86@kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/22] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq()
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:33:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140925143346.GF20089@laptop.dumpdata.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20140925143346.EhjefuZWPwzVA85NcdUTFHZEvVDK1YU4l6p7-ubohuo@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411614872-4009-5-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:14AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Commit 0e4ccb150 added two __weak arch functions arch_msix_mask_irq()
> and arch_msi_mask_irq() to fix a bug found when running xen in x86.
> Introduced these two funcntions make MSI code complex. And mask/unmask
"These two functions made the MSI code more complex."
> is the irq actions related to interrupt controller, should not use
> weak arch functions to override mask/unmask interfaces. This patch
I am bit baffled of what you are saying.
> reverted commit 0e4ccb150 and export struct irq_chip msi_chip, modify
> msi_chip->irq_mask/irq_unmask() in xen init functions to fix this
> bug for simplicity. Also this is preparation for using struct
> msi_chip instead of weak arch MSI functions in all platforms.
> Keep default_msi_mask_irq() and default_msix_mask_irq() in
> linux/msi.h to make s390 MSI code compile happy, they wiil be removed
s/wiil/will.
> in the later patch.
>
> Tested-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
I don't even remember testing it - I guess I did the earlier version.
So a couple of questions since I've totally forgotten about this:
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index 50f67a3..5f8f3af 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ u32 msi_mask(unsigned x)
> * reliably as devices without an INTx disable bit will then generate a
> * level IRQ which will never be cleared.
> */
> -u32 default_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> +u32 __msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> {
> u32 mask_bits = desc->masked;
>
> @@ -176,14 +176,9 @@ u32 default_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> return mask_bits;
> }
>
> -__weak u32 arch_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> -{
> - return default_msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, flag);
> -}
> -
> static void msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> {
> - desc->masked = arch_msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, flag);
> + desc->masked = __msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, flag);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -193,7 +188,7 @@ static void msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> * file. This saves a few milliseconds when initialising devices with lots
> * of MSI-X interrupts.
> */
> -u32 default_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> +u32 __msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> {
> u32 mask_bits = desc->masked;
> unsigned offset = desc->msi_attrib.entry_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE +
> @@ -206,14 +201,9 @@ u32 default_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> return mask_bits;
> }
>
> -__weak u32 arch_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> -{
> - return default_msix_mask_irq(desc, flag);
> -}
> -
> static void msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> {
> - desc->masked = arch_msix_mask_irq(desc, flag);
> + desc->masked = __msix_mask_irq(desc, flag);
> }
>
> static void msi_set_mask_bit(struct irq_data *data, u32 flag)
> @@ -852,7 +842,7 @@ void pci_msi_shutdown(struct pci_dev *dev)
> /* Return the device with MSI unmasked as initial states */
> mask = msi_mask(desc->msi_attrib.multi_cap);
> /* Keep cached state to be restored */
> - arch_msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, ~mask);
> + __msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, ~mask);
If I am reading this right, it will call the old 'default_msi_mask_irq'
which is exactly what we don't want to do under Xen. We want to call
the NOP code.
>
> /* Restore dev->irq to its default pin-assertion irq */
> dev->irq = desc->msi_attrib.default_irq;
> @@ -950,7 +940,7 @@ void pci_msix_shutdown(struct pci_dev *dev)
> /* Return the device with MSI-X masked as initial states */
> list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
> /* Keep cached states to be restored */
> - arch_msix_mask_irq(entry, 1);
> + __msix_mask_irq(entry, 1);
Ditto here.
Looking more at this code I have to retract my Reviewed-by and Tested-by
on the whole series.
Is it possible to get a git tree for this please?
> }
>
> msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE, 0);
> diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
> index 45ef8cb..cc46a62 100644
> --- a/include/linux/msi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/msi.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ void read_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg);
> void get_cached_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg);
> void __write_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg);
> void write_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg);
> +u32 __msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag);
> +u32 __msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag);
>
> struct msi_desc {
> struct {
> @@ -59,8 +61,8 @@ void arch_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
>
> void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
> void default_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
> -u32 default_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag);
> -u32 default_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag);
> +#define default_msi_mask_irq __msi_mask_irq
> +#define default_msix_mask_irq __msix_mask_irq
>
> struct msi_chip {
> struct module *owner;
> --
> 1.7.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-25 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 140+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-25 3:14 [PATCH v2 00/22] Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 03/22] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 7:19 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-25 7:19 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 2:04 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 2:04 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <5424C9BD.3040506-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-26 8:09 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 8:09 ` Thierry Reding
[not found] ` <1411614872-4009-4-git-send-email-wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-26 8:09 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 8:09 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 05/22] s390/MSI: Use __msi_mask_irq() instead of default_msi_mask_irq() Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 06/22] PCI/MSI: Introduce weak arch_find_msi_chip() to find MSI chip Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 7:26 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-25 7:26 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 2:10 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 2:10 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <1411614872-4009-7-git-send-email-wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-25 10:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-25 10:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-26 2:33 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 2:33 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 2:44 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 2:44 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <5424D30A.6040900-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-26 10:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-26 10:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-28 2:35 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-28 2:35 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 07/22] PCI/MSI: Refactor struct msi_chip to make it become more common Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 08/22] x86/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 09/22] x86/xen/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 10/22] Irq_remapping/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 12/22] MIPS/Octeon/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <1411614872-4009-13-git-send-email-wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-25 7:34 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-25 7:34 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 2:12 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 2:12 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 13/22] MIPS/Xlp: Remove the dead function destroy_irq() to fix build error Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <1411614872-4009-1-git-send-email-wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 01/22] PCI/MSI: Clean up struct msi_chip argument Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <1411614872-4009-2-git-send-email-wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-25 7:15 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-25 7:15 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-25 10:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-25 10:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-26 2:15 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 2:15 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 1:58 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 1:58 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 02/22] PCI/MSI: Remove useless bus->msi assignment Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <1411614872-4009-3-git-send-email-wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-25 7:06 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-25 7:06 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 1:55 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 1:55 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 04/22] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq() Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <1411614872-4009-5-git-send-email-wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-25 14:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-09-25 14:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-26 3:12 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 3:12 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 11/22] x86/MSI: Remove unused MSI weak arch functions Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 14/22] MIPS/Xlp/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <1411614872-4009-15-git-send-email-wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-25 7:36 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-25 7:36 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 2:13 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 2:13 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 15/22] MIPS/Xlr/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <1411614872-4009-16-git-send-email-wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-25 7:37 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-25 7:37 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 2:13 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 2:13 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 16/22] Powerpc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 17/22] s390/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <1411614872-4009-18-git-send-email-wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-25 7:38 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-25 7:38 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 2:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 2:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 18/22] arm/iop13xx/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 19/22] IA64/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 20/22] Sparc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 21/22] tile/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 22/22] PCI/MSI: Clean up unused MSI arch functions Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 3:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 00/22] Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Thierry Reding
2014-09-25 7:42 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-25 14:48 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-25 14:48 ` Liviu Dudau
[not found] ` <20140925144855.GB31157-hOhETlTuV5niMG9XS5x8Mg@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-25 16:49 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-25 16:49 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-25 17:16 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-25 17:16 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-26 6:20 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 6:20 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <542505B3.7040208-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-26 8:54 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 8:54 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 9:05 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 9:05 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-28 2:32 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-28 2:32 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-28 6:11 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-28 6:11 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-29 8:37 ` Lucas Stach
2014-09-29 8:37 ` Lucas Stach
2014-09-29 10:13 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-29 10:13 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 3:42 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 3:42 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <5424E09F.50701-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-26 8:50 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-26 8:50 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-28 2:16 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-28 2:16 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <54276F6C.5010705-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-28 11:21 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-28 11:21 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-29 1:44 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-29 1:44 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <5428B971.50101-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-29 9:26 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-29 9:26 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-29 10:12 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-29 10:12 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 14:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-25 14:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-26 2:47 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-26 2:47 ` Yijing Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140925143346.GF20089@laptop.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk-qhclzuegtsvqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arnab.basu-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cmetcalf-kv+TWInifGbQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=huxinwei-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mips-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mpe-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ralf-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sebott-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tony.luck-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xen-devel-GuqFBffKawtpuQazS67q72D2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).