From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] Cross-architecture definitions of relaxed MMIO accessors Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:23:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20140929082323.GE12506@ulmo> References: <1411579056-16966-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> <9197976.uQdLmtvIl1@wuerfel> <20140926134608.GT5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <3359318.XmOCYLZHTV@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S" Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com ([74.125.82.176]:41653 "EHLO mail-we0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750911AbaI2IX2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 04:23:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3359318.XmOCYLZHTV@wuerfel> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Will Deacon , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "benh@kernel.crashing.org" , "chris@zankel.net" , "cmetcalf@tilera.com" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "deller@gmx.de" , "dhowells@redhat.com" , "geert@linux-m68k.org" , "heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "jcmvbkbc@gmail.com" , "jesper.nilsson@axis.com" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "monstr@monstr.eu" , "paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "rdunlap@infradead.org" --cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:36:13PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 26 September 2014 14:46:08 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >=20 > > Obviously, this does nothing for the: > >=20 > > include/asm-generic/io.h:804:29: error: redefinition of 'virt_to_bus' > > include/asm-generic/io.h:809:21: error: redefinition of 'bus_to_virt' > >=20 > > errors which are also reported in Olof's build system. > >=20 > > Given how close we are to the merge window, I'd suggest this stuff gets > > reverted so that it can have a better period of testing, rather than > > stuffing it into -next at such a critical time. >=20 > Right, I've fixed these all up locally, but then found new warnings on > allmodconfig builds that I haven't been able to track down yet. >=20 > I've dropped everything from the asm-generic tree now, so we can get > a clean linux-next tree. How about if I keep iterating this series? It seems like most failures can be reproduced by doing ARM defconfig and allmodconfig builds, so I'll do those and fix up any issues I find. Hopefully I can squash all these before 3.18-rc1, then we can take it into linux-next early for 3.19? In the meantime perhaps I can work with Olof to get a branch with these patches tested on his builder? And perhaps on the 0-day builder in addition? Thierry --cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUKRb7AAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhshQP/RiSEwIi1Y4jQR6s76b28fz0 JQ5L1MNGQE98LBHMJqd5nRkOhoTb91WrIVzhXtO4AsqyvuQZ75K7dP4u2v0PtRr4 Qz7w1XuHU6z79nv9R82jOhWplQymANW/3pfgpNbmRNW9t2OxVvsdyvDDk8eRZJ8T NxYSW5AA76ZU2NbNaN+cd/UKm5BQB979v5Y1rv9UVGzdU7H9Y463VhWheIp4GuzF cjgN7skIOeo7nE/YKKsmzzXIaxZG0rF8KaMpc+0eCfTFR4gr5hgAf9iCpJ5es9JP z40zSojHMmBYGGBUFsG/fYcdVGkYk8ui5fB++9dGllI6Dk0juBOTOpNNQ3ewJWoj mjWln79ljJZgVxqZ6RMB0yd6yAqzZHl+v29hiwzXS5RKFKJ7IqUA/JQ2in4fz8MI q9z4/wrnH/YuClU26Ni7cuvXGSoN/hiDqBUeIujEM/rWQxT5XGjPWC7ez3+D5b/p AOWVI/uajUIazESUVe4Rr7hDcMB7u39ZhXG75VyQz/6O3gkf3RtM0iKEAa6KSM6+ E8tvuV6Zoki1bj03XNM/d/QRvs+JLC+gqNptj1yU5d1RkH4TeNomtPr5tgkQ37zM w8to/JRjqt+sT/K8N8472XOXxNdJyw9pSEgUtYVvHDRW+d7vNTeI0C3zzM5/RDF2 wCPg2Rovs0sGKhHCEAxU =+Hzh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com ([74.125.82.176]:41653 "EHLO mail-we0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750911AbaI2IX2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 04:23:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:23:25 +0200 From: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] Cross-architecture definitions of relaxed MMIO accessors Message-ID: <20140929082323.GE12506@ulmo> References: <1411579056-16966-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> <9197976.uQdLmtvIl1@wuerfel> <20140926134608.GT5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <3359318.XmOCYLZHTV@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3359318.XmOCYLZHTV@wuerfel> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Will Deacon , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "benh@kernel.crashing.org" , "chris@zankel.net" , "cmetcalf@tilera.com" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "deller@gmx.de" , "dhowells@redhat.com" , "geert@linux-m68k.org" , "heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "jcmvbkbc@gmail.com" , "jesper.nilsson@axis.com" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "monstr@monstr.eu" , "paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "rdunlap@infradead.org" , "sam@ravnborg.org" , "schwidefsky@de.ibm.com" , "starvik@axis.com" , "takata@linux-m32r.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "daniel.thompson@linaro.org" , "broonie@linaro.org" Message-ID: <20140929082325.q_IHjT3TMz7SJR9TgCqYJ-iRojW08teW5ZD1zSZ6OQM@z> --cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:36:13PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 26 September 2014 14:46:08 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >=20 > > Obviously, this does nothing for the: > >=20 > > include/asm-generic/io.h:804:29: error: redefinition of 'virt_to_bus' > > include/asm-generic/io.h:809:21: error: redefinition of 'bus_to_virt' > >=20 > > errors which are also reported in Olof's build system. > >=20 > > Given how close we are to the merge window, I'd suggest this stuff gets > > reverted so that it can have a better period of testing, rather than > > stuffing it into -next at such a critical time. >=20 > Right, I've fixed these all up locally, but then found new warnings on > allmodconfig builds that I haven't been able to track down yet. >=20 > I've dropped everything from the asm-generic tree now, so we can get > a clean linux-next tree. How about if I keep iterating this series? It seems like most failures can be reproduced by doing ARM defconfig and allmodconfig builds, so I'll do those and fix up any issues I find. Hopefully I can squash all these before 3.18-rc1, then we can take it into linux-next early for 3.19? In the meantime perhaps I can work with Olof to get a branch with these patches tested on his builder? And perhaps on the 0-day builder in addition? Thierry --cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUKRb7AAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhshQP/RiSEwIi1Y4jQR6s76b28fz0 JQ5L1MNGQE98LBHMJqd5nRkOhoTb91WrIVzhXtO4AsqyvuQZ75K7dP4u2v0PtRr4 Qz7w1XuHU6z79nv9R82jOhWplQymANW/3pfgpNbmRNW9t2OxVvsdyvDDk8eRZJ8T NxYSW5AA76ZU2NbNaN+cd/UKm5BQB979v5Y1rv9UVGzdU7H9Y463VhWheIp4GuzF cjgN7skIOeo7nE/YKKsmzzXIaxZG0rF8KaMpc+0eCfTFR4gr5hgAf9iCpJ5es9JP z40zSojHMmBYGGBUFsG/fYcdVGkYk8ui5fB++9dGllI6Dk0juBOTOpNNQ3ewJWoj mjWln79ljJZgVxqZ6RMB0yd6yAqzZHl+v29hiwzXS5RKFKJ7IqUA/JQ2in4fz8MI q9z4/wrnH/YuClU26Ni7cuvXGSoN/hiDqBUeIujEM/rWQxT5XGjPWC7ez3+D5b/p AOWVI/uajUIazESUVe4Rr7hDcMB7u39ZhXG75VyQz/6O3gkf3RtM0iKEAa6KSM6+ E8tvuV6Zoki1bj03XNM/d/QRvs+JLC+gqNptj1yU5d1RkH4TeNomtPr5tgkQ37zM w8to/JRjqt+sT/K8N8472XOXxNdJyw9pSEgUtYVvHDRW+d7vNTeI0C3zzM5/RDF2 wCPg2Rovs0sGKhHCEAxU =+Hzh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S--