From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/6] mm: Introduce a general RCU get_user_pages_fast. Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 18:54:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20141002165430.GK2342@redhat.com> References: <1411740233-28038-1-git-send-email-steve.capper@linaro.org> <1411740233-28038-2-git-send-email-steve.capper@linaro.org> <20141002121902.GA2342@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Steve Capper Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Catalin Marinas , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Will Deacon , Gary Robertson , Christoffer Dall , Peter Zijlstra , Anders Roxell , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , Dann Frazier , Mark Rutland , Mel Gorman , Hugh Dickins List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:18:00PM +0700, Steve Capper wrote: > mm/gup.c was recently created? > It may even make sense to move the weak version in a future patch? I think the __weak stuff tends to go in lib, that's probably why it's there. I don't mind either ways. > I'm currently on holiday and have very limited access to email, I'd > appreciate it if someone can keep an eye out for this during the merge > window if this conflict arises? No problem, I assume Andrew will merge your patchset first, so I can resubmit against -mm patching the gup_fast_rcu too. Thanks, Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11720 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751951AbaJBQzl (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:55:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 18:54:30 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/6] mm: Introduce a general RCU get_user_pages_fast. Message-ID: <20141002165430.GK2342@redhat.com> References: <1411740233-28038-1-git-send-email-steve.capper@linaro.org> <1411740233-28038-2-git-send-email-steve.capper@linaro.org> <20141002121902.GA2342@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Steve Capper Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Catalin Marinas , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Will Deacon , Gary Robertson , Christoffer Dall , Peter Zijlstra , Anders Roxell , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , Dann Frazier , Mark Rutland , Mel Gorman , Hugh Dickins Message-ID: <20141002165430.rBhz-h5Rsw9Q0BoNypxbamUXAYOQHrjyWZnuSKgWbtc@z> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:18:00PM +0700, Steve Capper wrote: > mm/gup.c was recently created? > It may even make sense to move the weak version in a future patch? I think the __weak stuff tends to go in lib, that's probably why it's there. I don't mind either ways. > I'm currently on holiday and have very limited access to email, I'd > appreciate it if someone can keep an eye out for this during the merge > window if this conflict arises? No problem, I assume Andrew will merge your patchset first, so I can resubmit against -mm patching the gup_fast_rcu too. Thanks, Andrea