From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Meredydd Luff <meredydd@senatehouse.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 0/3] syscalls,x86: Add execveat() system call
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:50:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141112135009.5a887d200be262d94ba50495@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415379664-31555-1-git-send-email-drysdale@google.com>
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:01:01 +0000 David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com> wrote:
> This patch set adds execveat(2) for x86, and is derived from Meredydd
> Luff's patch from Sept 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/11/528).
>
> The primary aim of adding an execveat syscall is to allow an
> implementation of fexecve(3) that does not rely on the /proc
> filesystem, at least for executables (rather than scripts). The
> current glibc version of fexecve(3) is implemented via /proc, which
> causes problems in sandboxed or otherwise restricted environments.
Have the relevant glibc people seen/reviewed/liked this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-12 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-07 17:01 [PATCHv7 0/3] syscalls,x86: Add execveat() system call David Drysdale
[not found] ` <1415379664-31555-1-git-send-email-drysdale-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-07 17:01 ` [PATCHv7 1/3] syscalls,x86: implement " David Drysdale
2014-11-07 17:01 ` David Drysdale
2014-11-07 17:01 ` [PATCHv7 2/3] syscalls,x86: add selftest for execveat(2) David Drysdale
2014-11-07 17:01 ` David Drysdale
2014-11-07 17:01 ` [PATCHv7 man-pages 3/3] execveat.2: initial man page " David Drysdale
2014-11-12 21:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2014-11-13 14:42 ` [PATCHv7 0/3] syscalls,x86: Add execveat() system call David Drysdale
2014-11-13 14:42 ` David Drysdale
2014-11-13 20:13 ` Andrew Morton
2014-11-12 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2014-11-13 15:51 ` David Drysdale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141112135009.5a887d200be262d94ba50495@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dalias@aerifal.cx \
--cc=drysdale@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=meredydd@senatehouse.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox