From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] Revert h8300 archtecture support Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 22:55:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20150310055522.GA9699@roeck-us.net> References: <1425890830-29399-1-git-send-email-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:45511 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751016AbbCJFzj (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:55:39 -0400 Received: from mailnull by bh-25.webhostbox.net with sa-checked (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YVD8k-001F2E-HV for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 05:55:38 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1425890830-29399-1-git-send-email-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yoshinori Sato Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 05:46:54PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: > Hello. > > I rewriting h8300 support. > It might possibly be better to use the term "re-introduce" instead of rewrite or revert (as in the headline). Also, s/archtecture/architecture/ in the headline. Given that the reason for dropping the architecture in the first place was the lack of an active maintainer, I am somewhat surprised that you don't add one to the MAINTAINERS file. Guenter