From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: kill kmemcheck Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:44:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20150311.144443.1290707334236248572.davem@davemloft.net> References: <55004595.7020304@oracle.com> <20150311.132052.205877953171712952.davem@davemloft.net> <55007A9B.4010608@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:50033 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750779AbbCKSou (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:44:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55007A9B.4010608@oracle.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: sasha.levin@oracle.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org From: Sasha Levin Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:25:47 -0400 > You're probably wondering why there are changes to SPARC in that patchset? :) Libsanitizer doesn't even build have the time on sparc, the release manager has to hand patch it into building again every major release because of the way ASAN development is done out of tree and local commits to the gcc tree are basically written over during the next merge. So I'm a little bit bitter about this, as you can see. :)