From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>,
arnd@arndb.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, bp@suse.de, linux@roeck-us.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] asm-generic/pci_iomap.h: make custom PCI BAR requirements explicit
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 03:45:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150903014506.GR8051@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150829152505.GA23449@infradead.org>
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 08:25:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 05:17:27PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
> >
> > The S390 architecture requires a custom pci_iomap() implementation
> > as the asm-generic implementation assumes there are disjunctions
> > between PCI BARs, and on S390 PCI BAR are not disjunctive, S390 requires
> > the bar parameter in order to find the corresponding device and create
> > the mapping cookie.
> >
> > This clash with the asm-generic pci_iomap() implementation is implicit,
> > there are no current semantics to make this incompatability explicit.
> > Make the S390 PCI BAR non-disjunction incompatibility explicit, and
> > also pave the way for alternative incompatibilities to be defined.
> >
> > While at it, as with the ioremap*() variants, since we have no clear
> > semantics yet well defined provide a solution for them that returns
> > NULL. This allows architectures to move forward by defining pci_ioremap*()
> > variants without requiring immediate changes to all architectures. Each
> > architecture then can implement their own solution as needed and
> > when they get to it.
>
> Now that you have the config symbol available why not move the S390
> implementation to generic code based on that can kill of
> asm/pci_iomap.h? Seems like we're really not dealing with something
> inherent to the architecture, but two possible implementations based
> on architecture constraints.
That would be the other approach to take too, but perhaps that can wait
until yet another architecture with similar requirement pops up.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-03 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-29 0:17 [RFC] asm-generic/pci_iomap.h: make custom PCI BAR requirements explicit Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-08-29 2:13 ` Randy Dunlap
2015-10-02 23:17 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-10-04 0:14 ` Randy Dunlap
2015-10-05 16:58 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-08-29 15:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-09-03 1:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2015-08-30 19:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-03 1:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-09-03 1:47 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-09-08 9:54 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-09-08 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-11 8:14 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2015-10-03 0:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-10-03 0:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-10-02 23:53 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-10-04 19:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-04 19:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-05 17:09 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-10-05 17:09 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-10-06 11:15 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150903014506.GR8051@wotan.suse.de \
--to=mcgrof@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).