Re: [PATCH v3 16/17] resource: Kill walk_iomem_res()

[Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>]

On 01/05/16 at 11:54am, Toshi Kani wrote:
> walk_iomem_res_desc() replaced walk_iomem_res(), and there is no
> caller to walk_iomem_res() any more.
> 
> Kill walk_iomem_res().  Also remove @name from find_next_iomem_res()
> as it is no longer used.
> 
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/ioport.h |    3 ---
>  kernel/resource.c      |   49 +++++-------------------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
> index 2a4a5e8..afb4559 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ioport.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
> @@ -270,9 +270,6 @@ walk_system_ram_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
>  extern int
>  walk_iomem_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags, u64 start, u64 end,
>  		    void *arg, int (*func)(u64, u64, void *));
> -extern int
> -walk_iomem_res(char *name, unsigned long flags, u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
> -	       int (*func)(u64, u64, void *));
>  
>  /* True if any part of r1 overlaps r2 */
>  static inline bool resource_overlaps(struct resource *r1, struct resource *r2)
> diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> index 7b26f58..3ed5901 100644
> --- a/kernel/resource.c
> +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> @@ -335,13 +335,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
>  /*
>   * Finds the lowest iomem reosurce exists with-in [res->start.res->end)
>   * the caller must specify res->start, res->end, res->flags, and optionally
> - * desc and "name".  If found, returns 0, res is overwritten, if not found,
> - * returns -1.
> + * desc.  If found, returns 0, res is overwritten, if not found, returns -1.
>   * This walks through whole tree and not just first level children
>   * until and unless first_level_children_only is true.
>   */
>  static int find_next_iomem_res(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc,
> -				char *name, bool first_level_children_only)
> +				bool first_level_children_only)
>  {
>  	resource_size_t start, end;
>  	struct resource *p;
> @@ -363,8 +362,6 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc,
>  			continue;
>  		if ((desc != IORES_DESC_NONE) && (desc != p->desc))
>  			continue;
> -		if (name && strcmp(p->name, name))
> -			continue;
>  		if (p->start > end) {
>  			p = NULL;
>  			break;
> @@ -411,7 +408,7 @@ int walk_iomem_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags, u64 start,
>  	orig_end = res.end;
>  
>  	while ((res.start < res.end) &&
> -		(!find_next_iomem_res(&res, desc, NULL, false))) {
> +		(!find_next_iomem_res(&res, desc, false))) {
>  		ret = (*func)(res.start, res.end, arg);
>  		if (ret)
>  			break;
> @@ -423,42 +420,6 @@ int walk_iomem_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags, u64 start,
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Walks through iomem resources and calls func() with matching resource
> - * ranges. This walks through whole tree and not just first level children.
> - * All the memory ranges which overlap start,end and also match flags and
> - * name are valid candidates.
> - *
> - * @name: name of resource
> - * @flags: resource flags
> - * @start: start addr
> - * @end: end addr
> - *
> - * NOTE: This function is deprecated and should not be used in new code.
> - *       Use walk_iomem_res_desc(), instead.
> - */
> -int walk_iomem_res(char *name, unsigned long flags, u64 start, u64 end,
> -		void *arg, int (*func)(u64, u64, void *))
> -{
> -	struct resource res;
> -	u64 orig_end;
> -	int ret = -1;
> -
> -	res.start = start;
> -	res.end = end;
> -	res.flags = flags;
> -	orig_end = res.end;
> -	while ((res.start < res.end) &&
> -		(!find_next_iomem_res(&res, IORES_DESC_NONE, name, false))) {
> -		ret = (*func)(res.start, res.end, arg);
> -		if (ret)
> -			break;
> -		res.start = res.end + 1;
> -		res.end = orig_end;
> -	}
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -
> -/*
>   * This function calls callback against all memory range of System RAM
>   * which are marked as IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM and IORESOUCE_BUSY.
>   * Now, this function is only for System RAM. This function deals with
> @@ -477,7 +438,7 @@ int walk_system_ram_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
>  	res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
>  	orig_end = res.end;
>  	while ((res.start < res.end) &&
> -		(!find_next_iomem_res(&res, IORES_DESC_NONE, NULL, true))) {
> +		(!find_next_iomem_res(&res, IORES_DESC_NONE, true))) {
>  		ret = (*func)(res.start, res.end, arg);
>  		if (ret)
>  			break;
> @@ -507,7 +468,7 @@ int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  	res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
>  	orig_end = res.end;
>  	while ((res.start < res.end) &&
> -		(find_next_iomem_res(&res, IORES_DESC_NONE, NULL, true) >= 0)) {
> +		(find_next_iomem_res(&res, IORES_DESC_NONE, true) >= 0)) {
>  		pfn = (res.start + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  		end_pfn = (res.end + 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  		if (end_pfn > pfn)

Acked-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>

Thanks
Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>