linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC 11/12 v1] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:41:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160217164156.GU29196@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454444369-2146-12-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>

OK, so I have dropped patch 10 and reworked the x86 part to use the same
asm as __down_write uses. Does this look any better?

I am not an expert in inline asm so the way I am doing it might be not
optimal but at least the gerenated code looks sane (no changes for the
regular __down_write).
---
From d9a24cd6d6eb48602b11df56ecc3ea4e223ac18d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:21:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable

which uses the same fast path as __down_write except it falls back to
call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable slow path and return -EINTR if
killed. To prevent from code duplication extract the skeleton of
__down_write into a helper macro which just takes the semaphore
and the slow path function to be called.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S         |  8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
index d79a218675bc..4c3d90dbe89a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -99,21 +99,36 @@ static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 /*
  * lock for writing
  */
+#define ____down_write(sem, slow_path)			\
+({							\
+	long tmp;					\
+	struct rw_semaphore* ret = sem;			\
+	asm volatile("# beginning down_write\n\t"	\
+		     LOCK_PREFIX "  xadd      %1,(%2)\n\t"	\
+		     /* adds 0xffff0001, returns the old value */ \
+		     "  test " __ASM_SEL(%w1,%k1) "," __ASM_SEL(%w1,%k1) "\n\t" \
+		     /* was the active mask 0 before? */\
+		     "  jz        1f\n"			\
+		     "  call " slow_path "\n"		\
+		     "1:\n"				\
+		     "# ending down_write"		\
+		     : "+m" (sem->count), "=d" (tmp), "+a" (ret)	\
+		     : "a" (sem), "1" (RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS) \
+		     : "memory", "cc");			\
+	ret;						\
+})
+
 static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
-	long tmp;
-	asm volatile("# beginning down_write\n\t"
-		     LOCK_PREFIX "  xadd      %1,(%2)\n\t"
-		     /* adds 0xffff0001, returns the old value */
-		     "  test " __ASM_SEL(%w1,%k1) "," __ASM_SEL(%w1,%k1) "\n\t"
-		     /* was the active mask 0 before? */
-		     "  jz        1f\n"
-		     "  call call_rwsem_down_write_failed\n"
-		     "1:\n"
-		     "# ending down_write"
-		     : "+m" (sem->count), "=d" (tmp)
-		     : "a" (sem), "1" (RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
-		     : "memory", "cc");
+	____down_write(sem, "call_rwsem_down_write_failed");
+}
+
+static inline int __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	if (IS_ERR(____down_write(sem, "call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable")))
+		return -EINTR;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S b/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S
index 40027db99140..d1a1397e1fb3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S
@@ -101,6 +101,14 @@ ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_write_failed)
 	ret
 ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_write_failed)
 
+ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable)
+	save_common_regs
+	movq %rax,%rdi
+	call rwsem_down_write_failed_killable
+	restore_common_regs
+	ret
+ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable)
+
 ENTRY(call_rwsem_wake)
 	/* do nothing if still outstanding active readers */
 	__ASM_HALF_SIZE(dec) %__ASM_HALF_REG(dx)
-- 
2.7.0

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC 11/12 v1] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:41:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160217164156.GU29196@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
Message-ID: <20160217164156.pyoNPRGF9S1Hr9mmIqgE8bR0pmYINpmAfC2fvyO8Iac@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454444369-2146-12-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>

OK, so I have dropped patch 10 and reworked the x86 part to use the same
asm as __down_write uses. Does this look any better?

I am not an expert in inline asm so the way I am doing it might be not
optimal but at least the gerenated code looks sane (no changes for the
regular __down_write).
---

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-17 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-02 20:19 [RFC 0/12] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19 ` [RFC 01/12] locking, rwsem: get rid of __down_write_nested Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19 ` [RFC 02/12] locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19 ` [RFC 03/12] locking, rwsem: introduce basis for down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19 ` [RFC 04/12] alpha, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19 ` [RFC 05/12] ia64, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19 ` [RFC 06/12] s390, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19 ` [RFC 07/12] sh, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-03 11:19   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-03 12:11     ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-03 12:11       ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19 ` [RFC 08/12] sparc, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19 ` [RFC 09/12] xtensa, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19 ` [RFC 10/12] x86, rwsem: simplify __down_write Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-03  8:10   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-02-03  8:10     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-02-03 12:10     ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-03 12:10       ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 16:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-03 22:34       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-03 22:34         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-09 14:40       ` David Howells
2016-06-09 14:40         ` David Howells
2016-06-09 17:36         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-10 16:39           ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-06-10 16:39             ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-02-02 20:19 ` [RFC 11/12] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-17 16:41   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-02-17 16:41     ` [RFC 11/12 v1] " Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19 ` [RFC 12/12] locking, rwsem: provide down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 20:19   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-19 12:15 ` [RFC 0/12] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Michal Hocko
2016-02-19 12:15   ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-09 12:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-09 12:18   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-09 12:56   ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-09 12:56     ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-09 13:17     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-09 13:28       ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-09 13:43         ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-09 14:41           ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-10 10:24             ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-10 10:24               ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160217164156.GU29196@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).