From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: only use __xipram annotation when XIP_KERNEL is set Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 16:43:36 -0800 Message-ID: <20160305004336.GG55664@google.com> References: <1453736525-1959191-2-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20160305000225.GB55664@google.com> <5158260.vK2YuWzYIn@wuerfel> <20160305002203.GF55664@google.com> <1457137718.43867.266.camel@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:34297 "EHLO mail-pa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759049AbcCEAnj (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2016 19:43:39 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1457137718.43867.266.camel@infradead.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Woodhouse Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:28:38AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 16:22 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > > > > ...but, does anyone care about XIP / MTD_XIP then, if the first two > > examples we have both have long-standing build issues? > > I think there are people trying to make it work on other platforms, > yes. OK... can we kill the broken platforms though? I'm not confident that my and Arnd's workaround attempts will yield anything more than a pat on our own backs to say "yay, it compiles!" And given the number of practically unused things we're already maintaining in MTD, I'm always happy for an excuse to kill off some of it. Brian