From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Enhancing semantics with memremap() - aliasing with memremap() Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 09:58:28 -0700 Message-ID: <20160531165828.GA25366@infradead.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:43598 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751680AbcEaQ6i (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2016 12:58:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Dan Williams , Toshi Kani , Paul McKenney , Will Deacon , Christoph Hellwig , X86 ML , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arch , Julia Lawall , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Borislav Petkov On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 04:36:42PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Is it a good time for that now? I would hope identifying proper > aliasing uses for memremap() might be a bit easier now than for > ioremap() given its not used as widely. It may be an easier target to > also write some grammar rules for it as well. So you want an explicit opt-in flag to allow aliasing? Sounds fine to me.