From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 00/33] implement atomic_fetch_$op Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:55:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20160608125530.GB11563@gmail.com> References: <20160531101925.702692792@infradead.org> <20160602093304.GX3190@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160608124312.GA30927@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:37671 "EHLO mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161222AbcFHMzf (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 08:55:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160608124312.GA30927@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Vineet Gupta , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "boqun.feng@gmail.com" , "waiman.long@hpe.com" , "fweisbec@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "rth@twiddle.net" , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "egtvedt@samfundet.no" , "realmz6@gmail.com" , "ysato@users.sourceforge.jp" , "rkuo@codeaurora.org" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "geert@linux-m68k.org" * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:33:04AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:27:36AM +0000, Vineet Gupta wrote: > > > > What's ur merge plan - are u going to rebase/respin once more so I can push those > > > updates to Linus for 4.7-rc2. Or you could carry those ARC patches in ur tree - > > > ahead of ur series. I'd much rather prefer the revert / cleanup before adding new > > > code which extends the back off code only to be deleted later. > > > > I was hoping to get these into tip for v4.8, I can rebase on whatever > > changes you make in v4.7 no problem. > > -rc2 seems to have happened and I cannot seem to find changes to > arc/atomic.h, will you still be pushing those patches this window or > should I queue my patches? I'd much prefer to have all of these in the locking tree (i.e. tip:locking/core), to make it less painful all around. Thanks, Ingo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:37671 "EHLO mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161222AbcFHMzf (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 08:55:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:55:30 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 00/33] implement atomic_fetch_$op Message-ID: <20160608125530.GB11563@gmail.com> References: <20160531101925.702692792@infradead.org> <20160602093304.GX3190@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160608124312.GA30927@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160608124312.GA30927@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Vineet Gupta , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "boqun.feng@gmail.com" , "waiman.long@hpe.com" , "fweisbec@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "rth@twiddle.net" , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "egtvedt@samfundet.no" , "realmz6@gmail.com" , "ysato@users.sourceforge.jp" , "rkuo@codeaurora.org" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "geert@linux-m68k.org" , "james.hogan@imgtec.com" , "ralf@linux-mips.org" , "dhowells@redhat.com" , "jejb@parisc-linux.org" , "mpe@ellerman.id.au" , "schwidefsky@de.ibm.com" , "dalias@libc.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "cmetcalf@mellanox.com" , "jcmvbkbc@gmail.com" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "dbueso@suse.de" , "fengguang.wu@intel.com" Message-ID: <20160608125530.v_0CNrKhsoVpSs3qzv9LVNRFhdckmtqCmbGLWw8Up98@z> * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:33:04AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:27:36AM +0000, Vineet Gupta wrote: > > > > What's ur merge plan - are u going to rebase/respin once more so I can push those > > > updates to Linus for 4.7-rc2. Or you could carry those ARC patches in ur tree - > > > ahead of ur series. I'd much rather prefer the revert / cleanup before adding new > > > code which extends the back off code only to be deleted later. > > > > I was hoping to get these into tip for v4.8, I can rebase on whatever > > changes you make in v4.7 no problem. > > -rc2 seems to have happened and I cannot seem to find changes to > arc/atomic.h, will you still be pushing those patches this window or > should I queue my patches? I'd much prefer to have all of these in the locking tree (i.e. tip:locking/core), to make it less painful all around. Thanks, Ingo