From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 00/33] implement atomic_fetch_$op Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:38:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20160608143826.GN30909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20160531101925.702692792@infradead.org> <20160602093304.GX3190@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160608124312.GA30927@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160608125530.GB11563@gmail.com> <20160608133242.GS30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <57582A9F.2060307@synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:33609 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423826AbcFHOil (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:38:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57582A9F.2060307@synopsys.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Vineet Gupta Cc: Ingo Molnar , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "boqun.feng@gmail.com" , "waiman.long@hpe.com" , "fweisbec@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "rth@twiddle.net" , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "egtvedt@samfundet.no" , "realmz6@gmail.com" , "ysato@users.sourceforge.jp" , "rkuo@codeaurora.org" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "geert@linux-m68k.org" On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 07:54:31PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On Wednesday 08 June 2016 07:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:55:30PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > >> I'd much prefer to have all of these in the locking tree (i.e. tip:locking/core), > >> to make it less painful all around. > > > > All the fetch_op stuff, yes certainly. But Vineet wanted to munge > > arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h a bit in 4.7, which would make applying > > the arc fetch_op patch tricky. > > > > My patches are in linux-next already. I was hoping to squeeze in a different fix > before sending the pull request to Linus. But I don't want to stall you, will do > that first thing tomorrow morning. OK ? Much thanks!