From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>, "Leif Lindholm" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>, "Mark Salter" <msalter@redhat.com>, "Daniel Kiper" <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>, "Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, "Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>, "Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>, "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.or> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 10/18] x86/efi: Access EFI related tables in the clear Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:03:22 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20160613120322.GA2658@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <57599668.20000@amd.com> On Thu, 09 Jun, at 11:16:40AM, Tom Lendacky wrote: > > So maybe something along the lines of an enum that would have entries > (initially) like KERNEL_DATA (equal to zero) and EFI_DATA. Others could > be added later as needed. Sure, that works for me, though maybe BOOT_DATA would be more applicable considering the devicetree case too. > Would you then want to allow the protection attributes to be updated > by architecture specific code through something like a __weak function? > In the x86 case I can add this function as a non-SME specific function > that would initially just have the SME-related mask modification in it. Would we need a new function? Couldn't we just have a new FIXMAP_PAGE_* constant? e.g. would something like this work? --- enum memremap_owner { KERNEL_DATA = 0, BOOT_DATA, }; void __init * early_memremap(resource_size_t phys_addr, unsigned long size, enum memremap_owner owner) { pgprot_t prot; switch (owner) { case BOOT_DATA: prot = FIXMAP_PAGE_BOOT; break; case KERNEL_DATA: /* FALLTHROUGH */ default: prot = FIXMAP_PAGE_NORMAL; } return (__force void *)__early_ioremap(phys_addr, size, prot); } -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>, "Leif Lindholm" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>, "Mark Salter" <msalter@redhat.com>, "Daniel Kiper" <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>, "Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, "Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>, "Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>, "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 10/18] x86/efi: Access EFI related tables in the clear Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:03:22 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20160613120322.GA2658@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw) Message-ID: <20160613120322.2xtAHQi0nxqw0bihU3PuKI73FCWNu023PfUFs5QPtFE@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <57599668.20000@amd.com> On Thu, 09 Jun, at 11:16:40AM, Tom Lendacky wrote: > > So maybe something along the lines of an enum that would have entries > (initially) like KERNEL_DATA (equal to zero) and EFI_DATA. Others could > be added later as needed. Sure, that works for me, though maybe BOOT_DATA would be more applicable considering the devicetree case too. > Would you then want to allow the protection attributes to be updated > by architecture specific code through something like a __weak function? > In the x86 case I can add this function as a non-SME specific function > that would initially just have the SME-related mask modification in it. Would we need a new function? Couldn't we just have a new FIXMAP_PAGE_* constant? e.g. would something like this work? --- enum memremap_owner { KERNEL_DATA = 0, BOOT_DATA, }; void __init * early_memremap(resource_size_t phys_addr, unsigned long size, enum memremap_owner owner) { pgprot_t prot; switch (owner) { case BOOT_DATA: prot = FIXMAP_PAGE_BOOT; break; case KERNEL_DATA: /* FALLTHROUGH */ default: prot = FIXMAP_PAGE_NORMAL; } return (__force void *)__early_ioremap(phys_addr, size, prot); }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 12:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 149+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-04-26 22:55 [RFC PATCH v1 00/18] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (AMD) Tom Lendacky 2016-03-22 13:00 ` Pavel Machek 2016-03-22 13:00 ` Pavel Machek [not found] ` <20160322130058.GA16528-5NIqAleC692hcjWhqY66xCZi+YwRKgec@public.gmane.org> 2016-04-27 14:05 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-04-27 14:05 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-04-27 14:30 ` Pavel Machek 2016-04-27 14:30 ` Pavel Machek 2016-04-27 14:39 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-04-27 14:39 ` Borislav Petkov [not found] ` <20160427143951.GH21011-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org> 2016-04-27 14:58 ` Pavel Machek 2016-04-27 14:58 ` Pavel Machek 2016-04-27 15:47 ` Pavel Machek 2016-04-27 15:47 ` Pavel Machek 2016-04-27 14:21 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-27 14:21 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:55 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/18] x86: Set the write-protect cache mode for AMD processors Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:56 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20160426225604.13567.55443.stgit-qCXWGYdRb2BnqfbPTmsdiZQ+2ll4COg0XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> 2016-04-27 14:33 ` Andy Lutomirski 2016-04-27 14:33 ` Andy Lutomirski 2016-04-27 14:44 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-27 14:44 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-27 14:47 ` Andy Lutomirski 2016-04-27 14:47 ` Andy Lutomirski [not found] ` <CALCETrV+JzPZjrrqkhWSVfvKQt62Aq8NSW=ZvfdiAi8XKoLi8A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2016-04-27 15:05 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-27 15:05 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-27 15:12 ` Andy Lutomirski 2016-04-27 15:12 ` Andy Lutomirski 2016-04-27 15:31 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-04-27 15:31 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-04-27 15:34 ` Andy Lutomirski 2016-04-27 15:34 ` Andy Lutomirski 2016-04-26 22:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/18] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) build enablement Tom Lendacky 2016-03-22 13:01 ` Pavel Machek 2016-03-22 13:01 ` Pavel Machek 2016-04-27 15:17 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-27 15:17 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-27 15:30 ` Pavel Machek 2016-04-27 15:30 ` Pavel Machek 2016-04-27 15:41 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-04-27 15:41 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-04-27 16:41 ` Pavel Machek 2016-04-27 17:07 ` Robin Murphy 2016-04-27 17:07 ` Robin Murphy 2016-04-27 17:12 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-04-26 22:56 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/18] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) support Tom Lendacky 2016-03-22 13:03 ` Pavel Machek 2016-03-22 13:03 ` Pavel Machek 2016-04-27 16:20 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-27 16:20 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:56 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/18] x86: Add the Secure Memory Encryption cpu feature Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:56 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/18] x86: Handle reduction in physical address size with SME Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:56 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/18] x86: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:56 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/18] x86: Extend the early_memmap support with additional attrs Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:57 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/18] x86: Add support for early encryption/decryption of memory Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:57 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/18] x86: Insure that memory areas are encrypted when possible Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:57 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/18] x86/efi: Access EFI related tables in the clear Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:57 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20160426225740.13567.85438.stgit-qCXWGYdRb2BnqfbPTmsdiZQ+2ll4COg0XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> 2016-05-10 13:43 ` Matt Fleming 2016-05-10 13:43 ` Matt Fleming [not found] ` <20160510134358.GR2839-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> 2016-05-10 13:57 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-05-10 13:57 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-05-12 18:20 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-05-12 18:20 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-05-24 14:54 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-05-24 14:54 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-05-25 16:09 ` Daniel Kiper 2016-05-25 16:09 ` Daniel Kiper 2016-05-25 19:30 ` Matt Fleming 2016-05-25 19:30 ` Matt Fleming 2016-05-26 13:45 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-05-26 13:45 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-06-08 10:07 ` Matt Fleming 2016-06-08 10:07 ` Matt Fleming 2016-06-09 16:16 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-06-09 16:16 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-06-13 12:03 ` Matt Fleming [this message] 2016-06-13 12:03 ` Matt Fleming 2016-06-13 12:34 ` Matt Fleming 2016-06-13 12:34 ` Matt Fleming 2016-06-13 15:16 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-06-13 15:16 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-06-08 11:18 ` Matt Fleming 2016-06-08 11:18 ` Matt Fleming 2016-06-09 18:33 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-06-09 18:33 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-06-13 13:51 ` Matt Fleming 2016-06-13 13:51 ` Matt Fleming [not found] ` <20160613135110.GC2658-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> 2016-06-15 13:17 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-06-15 13:17 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <57615561.4090502-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> 2016-06-16 14:38 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-06-16 14:38 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-06-17 15:51 ` Matt Fleming 2016-06-17 15:51 ` Matt Fleming 2016-04-26 22:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/18] x86: Decrypt trampoline area if memory encryption is active Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:57 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:58 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/18] x86: Access device tree in the clear Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:58 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:58 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/18] x86: DMA support for memory encryption Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:58 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-29 7:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2016-04-29 15:12 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-29 15:12 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-29 16:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [not found] ` <20160429162757.GA1191-he5eyhs8q0BAdwtm4QZOy9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> 2016-04-29 23:49 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-29 23:49 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:58 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/18] iommu/amd: AMD IOMMU " Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:58 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:58 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/18] x86: Enable memory encryption on the APs Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:58 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-05-01 22:10 ` Huang, Kai [not found] ` <f37dd7de-23ad-f70f-c32d-a32f116215ce-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> 2016-05-03 15:59 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-05-03 15:59 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:58 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/18] x86: Do not specify encrypted memory for VGA mapping Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:58 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:58 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/18] x86/kvm: Enable Secure Memory Encryption of nested page tables Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:58 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:59 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/18] x86: Add support to turn on Secure Memory Encryption Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20160426225904.13567.538.stgit-qCXWGYdRb2BnqfbPTmsdiZQ+2ll4COg0XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> 2016-03-22 13:13 ` Pavel Machek 2016-03-22 13:13 ` Pavel Machek 2016-04-26 22:59 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20160426225553.13567.19459.stgit-qCXWGYdRb2BnqfbPTmsdiZQ+2ll4COg0XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> 2016-04-27 14:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/18] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (AMD) Andy Lutomirski 2016-04-27 14:39 ` Andy Lutomirski 2016-04-27 20:10 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-04-27 20:10 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-05-02 18:31 ` Andy Lutomirski 2016-05-02 18:31 ` Andy Lutomirski 2016-05-09 15:13 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-05-09 15:13 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-05-09 21:08 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-05-09 21:08 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-05-10 11:23 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-05-10 11:23 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-05-10 12:04 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-05-10 12:04 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-04-30 6:13 ` Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory) 2016-04-30 6:13 ` Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory) [not found] ` <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B402963918FDA-wwDBVnaDRpYSZAcGdq5asR6epYMZPwEe5NbjCUgZEJk@public.gmane.org> 2016-05-03 15:55 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-05-03 15:55 ` Tom Lendacky -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2016-04-26 22:45 Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/18] x86/efi: Access EFI related tables in the clear Tom Lendacky 2016-04-26 22:47 ` Tom Lendacky
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20160613120322.GA2658@codeblueprint.co.uk \ --to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \ --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.or \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \ --cc=bp@alien8.de \ --cc=corbet@lwn.net \ --cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \ --cc=dvyukov@google.com \ --cc=glider@google.com \ --cc=hpa@zytor.com \ --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=joro@8bytes.org \ --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \ --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=msalter@redhat.com \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).