From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:59:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20160615215918.GY30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1465944489-43440-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> <1465944489-43440-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> <20160615165659.GC2094@linux-80c1.suse> <20160615171250.GO30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <5761A7C0.6000709@hpe.com> <5761B4B7.3070102@hpe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5761B4B7.3070102@hpe.com> Sender: linux-ia64-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Waiman Long Cc: Davidlohr Bueso , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Jason Low , Dave Chinner , Scott J Norton , Douglas Hatch List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:04:07PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > > BTW, when will the smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep() patch goes into the tip > tree? My patch will have a dependency on that when I make the change. Should already be in as part of that spin_unlock_wait() fixup. /me checks.. tip/locking/core contains: 33ac279677dc ("locking/barriers: Introduce smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep()") From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:38424 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932084AbcFOV7Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:59:25 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:59:18 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier Message-ID: <20160615215918.GY30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1465944489-43440-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> <1465944489-43440-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> <20160615165659.GC2094@linux-80c1.suse> <20160615171250.GO30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <5761A7C0.6000709@hpe.com> <5761B4B7.3070102@hpe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5761B4B7.3070102@hpe.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Waiman Long Cc: Davidlohr Bueso , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Jason Low , Dave Chinner , Scott J Norton , Douglas Hatch Message-ID: <20160615215918.63r_vdNUiYTl6cNhp_iXXNIuseO7C-o21ps76oRCnok@z> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:04:07PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > > BTW, when will the smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep() patch goes into the tip > tree? My patch will have a dependency on that when I make the change. Should already be in as part of that spin_unlock_wait() fixup. /me checks.. tip/locking/core contains: 33ac279677dc ("locking/barriers: Introduce smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep()")