From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] [v3] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:41:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20160630094123.GA29268@gmail.com> References: <20160609000117.71AC7623@viggo.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160609000117.71AC7623@viggo.jf.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Dave Hansen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, Al Viro , Mel Gorman , Hugh Dickins List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org * Dave Hansen wrote: > Are there any concerns with merging these into the x86 tree so > that they go upstream for 4.8? The updates here are pretty > minor. > include/linux/pkeys.h | 39 +- > include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h | 5 + > include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 12 +- > mm/mprotect.c | 134 +- So I'd love to have some high level MM review & ack for these syscall ABI extensions. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:35499 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751575AbcF3Jn5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 05:43:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:41:23 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] [v3] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys Message-ID: <20160630094123.GA29268@gmail.com> References: <20160609000117.71AC7623@viggo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160609000117.71AC7623@viggo.jf.intel.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Dave Hansen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, Al Viro , Mel Gorman , Hugh Dickins Message-ID: <20160630094123.gGjyekU2vIggeQSIgcTxbtjxc-Ymbn840jkRcAc2U8s@z> * Dave Hansen wrote: > Are there any concerns with merging these into the x86 tree so > that they go upstream for 4.8? The updates here are pretty > minor. > include/linux/pkeys.h | 39 +- > include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h | 5 + > include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 12 +- > mm/mprotect.c | 134 +- So I'd love to have some high level MM review & ack for these syscall ABI extensions. Thanks, Ingo