From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/29] x86/die: Don't try to recover from an OOPS on a non-default stack Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 20:42:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20160703184213.GB1781@pd.tnic> References: <37ac7589ff0ea147e8a21cda5eb84d3af1f6cd60.1466974736.git.luto@kernel.org> <20160702172441.GA22748@pd.tnic> <20160702183451.e2nlfkfxlsuicbqd@treble> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:41710 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752845AbcGCSmX (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jul 2016 14:42:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Josh Poimboeuf , Andy Lutomirski , X86 ML , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arch , Nadav Amit , Kees Cook , Brian Gerst , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" , Linus Torvalds , Jann Horn , Heiko Carstens On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 07:25:05AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Given that the very next patch deletes this code, I vote for leaving > it alone. Or I could fold the patches together. Ah, true. Yes, please fold them together. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.