From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Borowski Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:16:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20161018001626.GA5976@angband.pl> References: <20161017100130.GA16013@angband.pl> <871szfb1x1.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871szfb1x1.fsf@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mathieu OTHACEHE Cc: Nicholas Piggin , Omar Sandoval , Michal Marek , Linus Torvalds , adobriyan@gmail.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:22:34PM +0200, Mathieu OTHACEHE wrote: > > +#include > > +#include > > Included twice. D'oh! > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > + > > +#include > > + > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > No for __sw_hweight32 and __sw_hweight64 ? diff --git a/include/asm-generic/asm-prototypes.h b/include/asm-generic/asm-prototypes.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..df13637 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/asm-generic/asm-prototypes.h @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +#include ... which has these. Alexey Dobriyan wrote: } bitops.h is wrong header as well. } Why do you need bitops for bunch of function prototypes? Unless you guys prefer using low-level headers only, that is. Meow! -- A MAP07 (Dead Simple) raspberry tincture recipe: 0.5l 95% alcohol, 1kg raspberries, 0.4kg sugar; put into a big jar for 1 month. Filter out and throw away the fruits (can dump them into a cake, etc), let the drink age at least 3-6 months. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tartarus.angband.pl ([89.206.35.136]:39887 "EHLO tartarus.angband.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933002AbcJRAQl (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:16:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:16:26 +0200 From: Adam Borowski Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.9-rc1 Message-ID: <20161018001626.GA5976@angband.pl> References: <20161017100130.GA16013@angband.pl> <871szfb1x1.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871szfb1x1.fsf@gmail.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mathieu OTHACEHE Cc: Nicholas Piggin , Omar Sandoval , Michal Marek , Linus Torvalds , adobriyan@gmail.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20161018001626.fT38I4Q5De2fJJD83ws80l-B9QpS6tob9gFvX_zrFwU@z> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:22:34PM +0200, Mathieu OTHACEHE wrote: > > +#include > > +#include > > Included twice. D'oh! > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > + > > +#include > > + > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > No for __sw_hweight32 and __sw_hweight64 ? diff --git a/include/asm-generic/asm-prototypes.h b/include/asm-generic/asm-prototypes.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..df13637 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/asm-generic/asm-prototypes.h @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +#include ... which has these. Alexey Dobriyan wrote: } bitops.h is wrong header as well. } Why do you need bitops for bunch of function prototypes? Unless you guys prefer using low-level headers only, that is. Meow! -- A MAP07 (Dead Simple) raspberry tincture recipe: 0.5l 95% alcohol, 1kg raspberries, 0.4kg sugar; put into a big jar for 1 month. Filter out and throw away the fruits (can dump them into a cake, etc), let the drink age at least 3-6 months.