From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [RFC][ATCH 1/3] ptrace: Remove maxargs from task_current_syscall() Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:13:43 -0500 Message-ID: <20161108161343.5c8cfa55@gandalf.local.home> References: <20161107212634.529267342@goodmis.org> <20161107213233.466776454@goodmis.org> <20161108144851.7a35c37d@gandalf.local.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtprelay0094.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.94]:57036 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753904AbcKHVNr (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:13:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-arch , Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Zijlstra , Roland McGrath , Linus Torvalds On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 13:06:35 -0800 Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Or you could > embed seccomp_data in a bigger structure. I was thinking about doing just that. But for now, I may just use seccomp_data and when we want to add more, we can do the embedding. -- Steve