From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [git pull] uaccess-related bits of vfs.git Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 20:34:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20170513193424.GD390@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20170501034536.GX29622@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20170513065745.GV390@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20170513170056.GX390@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20170513180413.GZ390@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20170513182656.GA390@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20170513191142.GB390@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:42266 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753502AbdEMTe0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2017 15:34:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170513191142.GB390@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 08:11:42PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > It's not impossible to review; the problem is in figuring out which codepaths > are hot enough to worry about them. And I'm even more convinced that > bulk search-and-replace is the right approach here; we probably _can_ get ^- not apologies for sloppy editing... > rid of that shit this cycle (or, at least, reduce its use to very few places > in arch/*), but that'll require some cooperation from architecture maintainers.