From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] uaccess-related bits of vfs.git
Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 20:56:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170513195659.GE390@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFw8RHphGi7kAZdot_PikJGaB=FthHn8Q=1EuCVz=0gd_g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:00:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > We should probably even consider looking at __get_user/__put_user().
> > Few of them are actually performance-critical.
>
> Look at that date. It's over two years ago. In the intervening two
> years, how many of those conversions have happened?
>
> Here's a hint: it's a very very round number.
FWIW, just this cycle (this one I remembered off-hand, there might be
more):
commit edb88cef0570914375d461107759cf0d6d677ed5
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sat Apr 22 00:02:31 2017 +0200
scsi: pmcraid: use normal copy_from_user
As pointed out by Al Viro for my previous series, the driver has no need
to call access_ok() and __copy_from_user()/__copy_to_user(). Changing
it to regular copy_from_user()/copy_to_user() simplifies the code without
any real downsides, making it less error-prone at best.
This patch by itself also addresses the warning about the access_ok()
macro on MIPS, but both fixes improve the code, so ideally we apply
them both.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-13 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CA+55aFww=ZG0wPad3ELg+ibScr0eWuSxvhGLFaF+PO9kfkSkdw@mail.gmail.com>
2017-05-01 3:45 ` [git pull] uaccess-related bits of vfs.git Al Viro
2017-05-13 1:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-05-13 6:57 ` Al Viro
2017-05-13 12:05 ` Adam Borowski
2017-05-13 13:46 ` Brian Gerst
2017-05-13 13:46 ` Brian Gerst
2017-05-13 16:46 ` Al Viro
2017-05-13 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-05-13 16:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-05-13 17:00 ` Al Viro
2017-05-13 17:12 ` Al Viro
2017-05-13 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-05-13 18:04 ` Al Viro
2017-05-13 18:26 ` Al Viro
2017-05-13 19:11 ` Al Viro
2017-05-13 19:34 ` Al Viro
2017-05-13 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-05-13 19:17 ` Al Viro
2017-05-13 19:56 ` Al Viro [this message]
2017-05-13 20:08 ` Al Viro
2017-05-13 20:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-05-13 20:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-05-13 20:45 ` Al Viro
2017-05-13 20:37 ` Al Viro
2017-05-13 20:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-05-13 21:25 ` Al Viro
2017-05-14 18:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-05-14 18:57 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170513195659.GE390@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).