From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@oracle.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4][V3] Improve watchdog config for arch watchdogs
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 10:37:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170607143751.rnaa5c4jeggptvic@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d274b1a5-c8b3-9e3a-b45d-c63c9022be91@oracle.com>
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 02:46:48PM -0500, Babu Moger wrote:
> Hi Don, Nicholas,
>
>
> On 6/6/2017 11:08 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> > (adding Babu)
> >
> > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:26:55AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > Since last time:
> > >
> > > - Have the perf based hardlockup detector use arch_touch_nmi_watchdog()
> > > rather than hld_touch_nmi_watchdog(). This changes direction slightly
> > > to make the perf-based hard lockup detector an alternative that an
> > > arch may select, rather than standalone. This better reflects how the
> > > code works in practice).
> > >
> > > - Hopefully fixed the Kconfig options. There's still a bit of ugliness
> > > that will require another pass or two over interfaces and config
> > > scheme, but the idea is to make a minimal change to get the powerpc
> > > HLD in, which gives a reasonable starting point to improve things
> > > further.
> > Hi Babu,
> >
> > Does this patchset break sparc? Specifically patch3 with all the config
> Patches applies, compiles fine and also works fine for most part. However,
> there are few issues.
Thanks for the quick turnaround!
>
> We need to enter 'N' or 'Y' for SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR.
>
> *
> * Restart config...
> *
> *
> * Debug Lockups and Hangs
> *
> Detect Hard and Soft Lockups (LOCKUP_DETECTOR) [Y/n/?] y
> Detect Soft Lockups (SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR) [N/y] (NEW)
>
> For SPARC, softlockup is enabled by default earlier. May be we need to
> submit another patch to enable this in
>
> arch/sparc/configs/sparc64_defconfig. Not a big issue.
Hmm, I think the nmi_enable/disable stuff is wrapped into the
SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR code, so you might need it. Though Nick did create a
separate interface outside of SOFTLOCKUP to something similar. I believe
patch4 introduces nmi_reconfigure().
Not sure if the spirit of the sparc nmi_watchdog code wants SOFTLOCKUP or
not.
>
>
> Another issue.
> before that patch
>
> # cat /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog
> 1
> # cat /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
> 1
>
> After the patch
>
> # cat /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog
> 1
> # cat /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
> 0
Yes, that is what I thought. Thanks for confirming!
>
> I think this is mostly due to change in this code below.
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> unsigned long __read_mostly watchdog_enabled =
> SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED|NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED;
>
> Old code was like this
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG) || defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR)
> unsigned long __read_mostly watchdog_enabled =
> SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED|NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED;
> #else
> unsigned long __read_mostly watchdog_enabled = SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED;
> #endif
>
> SPARC defines CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG.
I am still working with Nick to deal with these config issues. But I am
going to keep this one in mind while we work through it.
Cheers,
Don
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-07 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-30 1:26 [PATCH 0/4][V3] Improve watchdog config for arch watchdogs Nicholas Piggin
2017-05-30 1:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] watchdog: remove unused declaration Nicholas Piggin
2017-05-30 1:26 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-05-30 1:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] watchdog: Introduce arch_touch_nmi_watchdog() Nicholas Piggin
2017-05-30 1:26 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-05-30 1:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] watchdog: Split up config options Nicholas Piggin
2017-05-30 1:26 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-02 20:15 ` Don Zickus
2017-06-03 6:10 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-06 16:49 ` Don Zickus
2017-06-07 3:50 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-08 16:05 ` Don Zickus
2017-06-12 8:07 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-12 20:41 ` Don Zickus
2017-06-13 16:11 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-14 14:09 ` Don Zickus
2017-06-15 2:16 ` Babu Moger
2017-06-15 3:04 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-15 15:14 ` Babu Moger
2017-06-15 15:51 ` Don Zickus
2017-06-15 15:59 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-15 15:59 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-15 18:42 ` Don Zickus
2017-05-30 1:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] watchdog: Provide watchdog_reconfigure() for arch watchdogs Nicholas Piggin
2017-06-06 16:08 ` [PATCH 0/4][V3] Improve watchdog config " Don Zickus
2017-06-06 19:46 ` Babu Moger
2017-06-06 19:46 ` Babu Moger
2017-06-07 14:37 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2017-06-07 14:37 ` Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170607143751.rnaa5c4jeggptvic@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=babu.moger@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).