From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/36] x86/mm: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:23:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20170621082301.47lafavh6cstbwfl@pd.tnic> References: <20170616184947.18967.84890.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> <20170616185140.18967.61905.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tom Lendacky , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Brijesh Singh , Toshimitsu Kani , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Matt Fleming , Alexander Potapenko , "H. Peter Anvin" , Larry Woodman , Jonathan Corbet , Joerg Roedel , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Ingo Molnar , Andrey Ryabinin , Dave Young , Rik van Riel , Arnd Bergmann List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:18:59AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > That looks wrong. It's not decrypted it's rather unencrypted, right? Yeah, it previous versions of the patchset, "decrypted" and "unencrypted" were both present so we settled on "decrypted" for the nomenclature. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:49340 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751038AbdFUIXT (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2017 04:23:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:23:01 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/36] x86/mm: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption Message-ID: <20170621082301.47lafavh6cstbwfl@pd.tnic> References: <20170616184947.18967.84890.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> <20170616185140.18967.61905.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tom Lendacky , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Brijesh Singh , Toshimitsu Kani , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Matt Fleming , Alexander Potapenko , "H. Peter Anvin" , Larry Woodman , Jonathan Corbet , Joerg Roedel , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Ingo Molnar , Andrey Ryabinin , Dave Young , Rik van Riel , Arnd Bergmann , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Andy Lutomirski , Boris Ostrovsky , Dmitry Vyukov , Juergen Gross , Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <20170621082301.RBw8VPPovq7esfeMZAiK8cYKZkIBYM2KTPTBclqRBAM@z> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:18:59AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > That looks wrong. It's not decrypted it's rather unencrypted, right? Yeah, it previous versions of the patchset, "decrypted" and "unencrypted" were both present so we settled on "decrypted" for the nomenclature. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.