From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 12/26] arm64: Remove spin_unlock_wait() arch-specific definitions Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:29:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20170630172943.GY2393@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20170629235918.GA6445@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1498780894-8253-12-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170630092057.GD9726@arm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:57632 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751710AbdF3R3u (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:29:50 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v5UHTHuO070611 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:29:50 -0400 Received: from e14.ny.us.ibm.com (e14.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.204]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2bdm0wa24j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:29:49 -0400 Received: from localhost by e14.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:29:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170630092057.GD9726@arm.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Will Deacon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, dave@stgolabs.net, manfred@colorfullife.com, tj@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:20:57AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 05:01:20PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics, > > and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock > > pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific > > arch_spin_unlock_wait(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney > > Cc: Catalin Marinas > > Cc: Will Deacon > > Cc: > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > > Cc: Alan Stern > > Cc: Andrea Parri > > Cc: Linus Torvalds > > --- > > arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 58 ++++----------------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) > > I'm going to miss this code. ;-) ;-) ;-) > Acked-by: Will Deacon Applied, thank you! Thanx, Paul